• amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hopefully this doesn’t affect quad9 or cloud flare DNS, or I might have to go back to running a root resolver. The horrors.

    • Achsonaja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why not run unbound for a recursive resolver? Seems like a more private DNS solution

      • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I have straight bind running on my network already for local zones, it would be easy enough to switch it to be a root resolver. The only problem is it’s a lot slower. I use DoT to cloudflare for non-local zones (using blocky); if you run a root resolver, your DNS traffic is all in the clear. Not like it truly matters but I wouldn’t put it past my ISP to do DPI on DNS traffic to try to sell my data.

      • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I trust them more than my ISP (Verizon). Quad9 is, and I used it for some time as an upstream, but it is markedly slower for me than cloudflare. Those milliseconds add up for an impatient asshole like myself.