• maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t know anything about the law, the first paragraphs says:

      Bruce Lehrmann has lost his defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson, bringing to an end a sprawling legal saga which has gripped the nation.

      Really? No more legal stuff? Lehrmann can’t take this further?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Like @[email protected] said, he could appeal. But the judge also ruled that if he had needed to award damages, they would have been very low. So if he did appeal, he’d have to not only prove that the judgment was wrong to go against him, but also that damages should have been much higher. That makes the idea of an appeal much less…appealing.

        Mr Lehrmann would have been entitled to more than a nominal award but as the above analysis demonstrates, his award of ordinary compensatory damages would be very modest. Hence any augmentation of damages occasioned by the aggravating conduct, comes from a very low base. If it had been necessary to assess damages in favour of Mr Lehrmann, the appropriate and rational relationship between the actual harm sustained and the damages awarded would lead to total damages of $20,000.