• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      From the wiki page:

      only advertisers, not consumers, prefer video over text.

      This is so goddamn true it’s not even funny. One thing in particular that really pisses me off is when I’m looking for a relatively simple piece of information, like how to beat a level I’m stuck on in a game, and every single result is a 15 minute video I need to scrub through in order to find the same information I could have scanned a text block for and found an under a minute.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        I will search around for 10 minutes before I watch a video if I need a simple answer. I realize that’s probably a bigger waste of my time, but I don’t want to encourage that shit by adding to the algorithm.

        • eestileib
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          The search engines like it if you take longer to get your result, they get to show you more ads.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            I guess I’m screwed either way then, but at least I don’t have to wait for the video to get to the fucking point to find out whether or not it’s even helpful.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        At a large technology conference I attended recently I saw a demonstration where the URL of the video was handed to an AI bot. Some very detailed prompts for requests for information were given to the bot and it pulled out all the info the user requested.

        So maybe we’ll have ubiquitous AI to do the scrubbing for those 5 second answers now buried in 15 minute videos.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Sounds like it searched the subtitles, found the time stamps, and returned the relevant text. Useful, but ultimately a pretty simple bot.

          Much more impressive if it “watched” the video for the first time, formed it own subtitles, then pulled the data out. That would be a feat.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Much more detailed than that. In the video there was a 3 piece band playing for a few seconds on screen. The user prompt asked: “Tell me where I can buy the shirt the keyboardist is wearing at timestamp 32 seconds”. The Bot found the website of the vendor selling the shirt.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Okay, that’s pretty neat, but at the same time basically the same as loading a still image into a current AI image matching suite and having it identify a keyboard, then a shirt near the keyboard, then reverse image search that tshirt. It’s super cool to be able to do, but kinda standard at this point.

              I guess the interactivity, being able to feed in a url on the fly is the value add. I still would have liked my “generate subtitles then search them” imaginary bot more though.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Or game completion guides that insist on using 10 minute video clips instead of just putting a mark on a map.

        • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          There’s no way any of them would be on camera without the bare minimum of: old baseball cap backwards, bandana, tacticool sunglasses

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have a related thought. A lot of people are not good at reading. Those people are underrepresented on a text platform like this, but they’re out there.

        Something like half of US adults cannot read at an 6th grade level. ( https://www.apmresearchlab.org/10x-adult-literacy )

        The us’ education system is spotty. That doesn’t help. There’s also a long podcast about how reading is often taught badly: https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/ (yes, it has a transcript)

        But there are probably a lot of people who secretly sigh with relief when they find that five minute video instead of the two paragraph answer. They legit struggle to read it, and that’s uncomfortable and embarrassing.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s a fair point. Someone close to me would be like this.

          That said, if a chatbot can explain verbally, would that be better than video in most cases ?

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Verbally like read aloud? Probably worse because at least with video you can usually fast forward and see the preview to get a gist of what you’re looking at. Like if it’s a video game walkthrough I can fast forward until I see a part I recognize

      • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Every single Adobe tutorial ever. Why the fuck do I have to scrub through 30 minute videos to figure out where the fuck they moved some feature to after the last update?

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Unfortunately written walk throughs are often terribly written and the pictures are usually a fucking mess.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This might be part of why The Other Site became the de facto place for text-based discussion of niche interests.

          • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            From the wiki page:

            only advertisers, not consumers, prefer video over text.

            I’m saying even Truth social isn’t immune to wall street fuckery.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Ok, that’s not enshittification though.

              Enshittification is when a company initially provides a good service, often at competitive prices. But as their market saturates (or they just establish as a monopoly), they start turning to shittier and shittier ways to increase profit due to demand that businesses must continually grow profits, or they fail.

              “Enshittification” isn’t the same as “stuff gets shittier”.