An ally of President Vladimir Putin warned Europe on Tuesday that Russia has already drafted legislation to retaliate if nearly $300 billion of Russian assets were seized by the West and used to help Ukraine.

After President Vladimir Putin sent troops into Ukraine in 2022, the United States and its allies prohibited transactions with Russia’s central bank and finance ministry, blocking around $300 billion of sovereign Russian assets in the West.

Top officials in the United States want to seize the assets to help support Ukraine, though some bankers and European officials are worried that simply taking the assets would create a dangerous precedent.

The U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation on Saturday including a bill with a provision that would allow the confiscation of Russian sovereign assets, though the lion’s share of the assets are in Europe.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    7 months ago

    If they want to hurt us over it, it means it will hurt them if we do it.

    though some bankers and European officials are worried that simply taking the assets would create a dangerous precedent.

    Just make a law that it’s a 100% tax on assets identified as falling under sanctions related to a aggressive invading nation. Precedent limited.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Imagine if we set a dangerous precedent of seizing rich people’s assets if they are involved in anything nerfarious! Society would surely collapse!

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        7 months ago

        People get drafted, innocents gets killed, citizens get taxed, all considered a given when war comes knocking. But God forbid some rich oligarchs lose some percentage of their wealth over it.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also what kind of precedent is this: “If we ever were in a war of aggression, we don’t want our assets to be seized (even for the resulting damage).”

      Name proposals: War of Agression Tax, Imperialism Tax, WAR (Withhold Agressors Reparation) Tax

  • Beryl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What are they gonna do ? Finance far-right parties in all of Europe to sow discord ? Oh wait.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    7 months ago

    As a European I say: Let’s go bitch!

    We’ve been way too dependant on Russia. It’s time we acknowledge the actual cost for cheap gas and oil from Russia.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “And the Europeans will lose more than we do,” Matviyenko, who is a member of Russia’s powerful Security Council, said.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think “start a war and lose all your fucking money to pay for it” is a good precedent and everyone should immediately employ it.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree completely and would like that to apply to all countries, even mine. Let there be real consequences for the ultra-rich for a country starting wars, and maybe you’ll see the politics change. Maybe not, but I’d like to hope so.

    • JohnDClay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, I’m confused how they think they can retaliate.

      • Corkyskog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cyber warfare is a definite possibility. Although it seems short sighted to waste 0 days on that.

        • JohnDClay
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why would you draft legislation to do a cyber attack? Seems more like a military thing.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cyberwarfare, political interference, nuclear weapons, sabotage of infrastructure, assassinations…

        The question isn’t really “can Russia”, but “will Russia”. Because Russia doing any of those is probably going to produce a response in turn.

        • JohnDClay
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re already doing the first two, last three seem like they’d get way more escalation than they bargained for. They don’t have intermediate escalation options that they haven’t used already.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            They’re already doing the first two

            Not really a binary, though; they can dial things up or down.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    Have all the oligarchs dump their western real estate and crash the housing market?

    Please…

    • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not all of Russia, just the Kremlin and oligarchs. Many Russians are decent people, often deceived by their sociopath rulers and constant propaganda.

      • avater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Not all of Russia, just the Kremlin and oligarchs

        Really hate to burst your bubble here, but the Russians who are against their leaders are in the minority and a lot of Russians were and still are fine with the way their country has been reigned in the last decades and today. The myth that this is just Putin’s war is just that, a myth…

  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Kremlin has repeatedly said that any seizure of its assets would go against all the principles of free markets which the West proclaims and that it would undermine confidence in the U.S. dollar and euro while deterring global investment and undermining confidence in Western central banks.

    Like establishing an economic collaborative consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa that are all in talks to increase trade with each other, and ditch the dollar as their trade currency?
    Like attempting to undermine the petrodollar as the world reserve currency for purchasing oil?

    I don’t know what counters the west has in their bag, but it’s a little silly to make threats as if BRICS hasn’t been completely transparent about their plans the whole time.
    It’s kind of an empty threat if you’ve been openly working on it for decades while the (more powerful) nations you plan to ratfuck have had time to prepare. I also don’t know how China would manage with a loss or rapid decrease in trade. They seem a bit too pragmatic than to follow Russia into a hole.

    Some Russian officials have suggested that if Russian assets are confiscated then foreign investors’ assets stuck in special so-called type “C” accounts in Russia could face the same fate.

    I’m sure they’d have to target all western accounts at once. Targeting one type will lead to the rest quickly hemorrhaging their money out of country.
    And I don’t think they’d wind up attracting new western investment for decades if they pulled a move like that.

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    The US will never seize Russian assets because they are all on loan to the Republican Party.