Hello! I’ve been searching for a reddit alternative, and yes, I’ve picked Lemmy and Raddle, but here’s the thing. My morbid curiosity is perked up, and a part of me wants to join the “free speech” alternatives, like Saidit, Poal, etc. What’s wrong with me that I want to join toxic places? I mean, yes I’ll find a whole new perspective (albeit wrong), on political topics, but a part of me wants to be the antagonist, and post lefty memes, and music with a left-leaning message (bands from r/rabm) I know that’s like kicking the hornet’s nest, so you don’t need to start in with “that’s a bad idea” I know it is. My main point/question is, is it wrong to join a site with potential hate speech? Does it make someone a bad person?

    • moreeni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      No reason? Being murdered is still a consequence, isn’t it? Why wouldn’t I include it?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because “a consequence” doesn’t mean “any and every possible consequence anyone could think up”.

        • moreeni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          So a consequence isn’t a term to describe consequences, according to you. OK, I seem to get it now.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Go back and reread your first comment, and the comment you were replying to. It’s pretty clear why your comment was nonsensical in context to anyone interested in engaging in sensible good-faith conversation.

      • otp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Murder is illegal, and thus covered by other areas of the law.

        Freedom of speech doesn’t give others freedom to do whatever they want in respect to speech. You’re incorrectly extrapolating.