• mindbleach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Defending the reasons they’re a monopoly.

    They’re still a monopoly.

    • exocrinous@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      As opposed to Epic Games which literally has a contract saying only they can sell the game on PC. I like how you’re “opposing” monopolies by defending anticompetitive exclusive licensing deals.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Where the fuck did I do any of what you’re mad about?

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re not, actually. Just because you only see Epic (which still has market share despite every effort they’ve made to drive people away) doesn’t mean there aren’t other storefronts.

      They’re definitely part of an oligopoly, though.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Those other storefronts matter even less.

        Again: competition existing isn’t enough. It has to matter. Otherwise you’re describing a monopoly. It is a market dominated by one business.

          • mindbleach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            This is abuse. This is making up rationale, to ignore the actual fucking argument.

            Standard Oil, the clearest trust-busting case in history, only had 85% market share at its peak. Me telling you to count to one is not somehow climbing atop my high horse and repeating a conclusion. I am making an argument - it is not complicated - the basis and reasoning are right there for you to respond to, or not.

                • stardust@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Wrong? You have no call to action beyond saying steam is a monopoly? That’s the extent of your message?

                  • mindbleach
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    Correct, acknowledging a fact doesn’t require a to-do list. There’s not magically The Good Store when you admit: this store has a monopoly. But for some god damn reason everyone seems to think shitting on Epic or talking up GoG will change that Valve has an overwhelming market position!

                    I am ONLY talking about Steam’s market position. Nothing else is required. If you think there must be a yeah-but: the answer is no.

                    What is so complicated about acknowledging this company dominates its market, in a subthread that begins by noting how crucial its sales will be, for a fuckoff-massive game, from a celebrated studio? The central topic is ‘game’s not making the numbers they want’ and the root comment is ‘lotta people waiting on a Steam version’ and my reply is ‘yeah it’s almost like Steam’s the one store that actually fucking matters’ and this blindingly obvious fact makes people lose their god-damn minds.