• 50MYT@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not every big company does this.

    I work for a fortune 500. We had a “the customers are not going to be pleased” change get pushed to us, and a lot of internal backlash/pushback prevented it from happening.

    A competitor then did the thing we stopped, and got reamed by the public hard enough to set the standard of “your a dumbass if you even think about this”.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s what I’m talking about though. The stupid changes usually get caught, but you still have someone there who thought it was a good idea.

      • taladar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        And more importantly, while the stupid change itself might have been caught it usually doesn’t translate into a lesson not to listen to the person with the stupid idea next time.

      • Ookami38
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s the nature of collaborative problem solving though. I’ve proposed some dumb ideas before. I’m sure you have too. There’s nothing wrong with stupid ideas being proposed. The issues arise when you either are surrounded by yes-men or are too forceful and ignore the advice of everyone else.

          • Ookami38
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            edit: original post was in response to another comment. My bad.

            Yeah, once it stops being collaborative, it becomes a problem. The original act of just proposing a stupid idea is fine, because it’s collaborative, but as soon as one person (company,entity…) becomes too imposing to say no to, it’s just bad times.