• wander1236
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Even without zooming in there’s the double speech bubble tails and a missing end quote

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The double tails thing is sometimes normal/used, but that missing end quote for sure is a boo boo.

        Still, pretty good all things considered. Wonder what model was used.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          What the barn thing and koolaid man are both saying, “oh yeah”

          Why is kool-aid man holding his own handle? Seems dirty.

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        The double tails are because the house is also sentient and speaking in unison with the Kool Aid man

        • Alk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s just very happy the kool aid man didn’t bust through one of its walls.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You know it’s AI when the anthropomorphic pitcher of Kool-Aid is the least disturbing aspect. What’s with that cabbage patch head in the front?

        • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          you don’t find its plan, revealed here, to cut you in half and attach your legs, at the hips, to another pair of legs (instead of an upper body) disturbing?

          • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            idk if you can call image generation derived from colored static based on preexisting statistically common knowledge/examples “planning” per se xD

            Humans have come up with plenty worse, this is just more of the same at worst imo haha

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes, and it’s a great use of AI. Ai is great for this sort of surreal shit, whether for Humor purposes or just to be wowed. This is a much better lane for Ai.