• jxk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      You want an answer?

      So you’ve probably learned that if u is an eigenvector, then multiplying u by any scalar gives you another eigenvector with the same eigenvalue. That means that the set of all a*u where a is any scalar forms a 1-dimensional space (a line if this is a real vector space). This is an eigenspace of dimension one. The full definition of an eigenspace is as the set of all eigenvectors of a given eigenvalue. Now, if an eigenvalue has multiple independent eigenvectors, then the set of all eigenvectors for that eigenvalue is is still a linear space, but of dimension more than one. So for a real vector space, if an eigenvalue has two sets of independent eigenvectors, its eigenspace will be a 2-dimensional plane.

      That’s pretty much it.

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I, a mere mortal, have no idea what the fuck this meme is talking about and I am slightly afraid. This sounds like Deep Math™️

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      did you learn about eigenvectors? or did you just memorize what you needed to pass linear algebra?

      • Ziglin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I “learned” about them for quantum computing (I think that’s mostly linear algebra). I was kind of disappointed they’re just vectors I somehow expected them to do something weird (based off the name).

        • myslsl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          My experience with eigenstuff has been kind of a slow burn. At first it feels like “that’s it?”, then you do a bunch of tedious calculations that just kind of suck to do… But as you keep going they keep popping up in ways that lead to some really nice results in my opinion.

          • Ziglin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I guess it’s the same for me but I just kind of think of it as vector stuff not eigen* stuff.

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I learned enough about eigenvectors to handle differential equations lmao. Never took linear algebra

        I did watch the 3blue1brown series on linear algrebra tho

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Later back at the lab, after trusting this guy, all the boys with their white robes and clipboards scratching their heads: “The Eigenvalue is off the charts!”

  • Ziglin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    After having looked them up they don’t seem that bad. Am I missing something?

    • myslsl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Eigenvectors, values, spaces etc are all pretty simple as basic definitions. They just turn out to be essential for the proofs of a lot of nice results in my opinion. Stuff like matrix diagonalization, gram schmidt orthogonalization, polar decomposition, singular value decomposition, pseudoinverses, the spectral theorem, jordan canonical form, rational canonical form, sylvesters law of inertia, a bunch of nice facts about orthogonal and normal operators, some nifty eigenvalue based formulas for the determinant and trace etc.