Why not?

After looking it up I have to correct myself, the Germanic plural - s also come from the accusative plural

My favourite false cognate is the plural ending -s in French and English. The English one has Germanic roots, while the French one come from Latin accusative plural -as/-os. They are unrelated etymologically.

You have to give credit to them, they start the whole thing with “Funny!!!”.

It sure is

Affen zusammen Spass!

As always, I will continue using my strategy of voting for the owl with the biggest ears

Aber “fau” macht Sinn ja?

If it’s male, call him Emlix for the same reason

Looks nervously to both sides in xz

This contradicts Der Hauptmann von Kõpenick

Nimm m1 Hochwähli und hau ab

Literally Fahrenheit 451

I thought it was forbidden to avoid money laundering, but not sure.

The use of the word “more” in “more money more problems” indicates that both money and problems are continuous variables. Thus, the statement should be modeled with predicate logic, but with analysis. As phrased, the sentence implies a positive derivative between the two variables. If assumed to be valid over the complete range of possible values, “less money, less problems” indeed follows.

J’apprécie que la photo est droite. Moi quand je prends une photo comme ça l’horizon est toujours de travers

Roquefort, the king of the cheeses

Or bacon and cheese egg sandwiches

Reminds me of a Mandelbrot fractal

Alles was es in meiner Kindheit gab hat es schon immer gegeben. Alles andere ist neumodischer Unsinn.

Which one of those is Jeff Daniels?