Berkeley has this really cool program called BOINC that you can download and donate your computer’s resources to processing scientific data. There are a bunch of projects to pick, from working on climate change, to cancer, to the Large Hadron Collider.

The good folks at linuxserver.io even have a ready to go Docker container for easy setup: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/boinc

Another possibility is running the Archive Team’s Warrior, which downloads data from at risk web sites and uploads them to the Internet Archive: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/ArchiveTeam_Warrior

Does anyone else have examples of projects like this? My dream is for the Fediverse to have this sort of feature eventually.

    • eros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One would assume they mean sitting around, doing nothing. Some would rather use some electricity to support a good cause than have the computing power sit there idle.

        • eros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean yeah, but no. It is spare capacity, so it’s spare in one way.

          I have hundreds of gigaflops of computing power sitting idle 80% of the time, I just don’t think the taxpayers would appreciate the power bill if I put it all to use like that. But at home I can spare a few cycles on my solar power sipping Proxmox cluster.

            • eros@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Idle computing capacity that installed, online, but is not being used all the time is exactly what I thought the OP was talking about and calling spare. They said computing power to spare, not space or equipment. I don’t understand your argument about installing equipment, that to me isn’t what OP was talking about. 🤷‍♀️ Kinda like the spare capacity that CompuServe had from their time sharing service that they used to bring their online service to the masses at night.

              Sorry you didn’t appreciate my reply. I was trying to explain my point with real examples from my experience. I don’t need your validation. I kinda regret trying to make you see both sides now. But whatever, you do you.

  • CaptObvious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve participated in their SETI and cancer research projects in the past. It’s a good cause, and I don’t mind making a donation.

    I did think the BOINC project was shut down, though. Good to know it’s still going.

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now I know this is being done with encryption, but an open tunnel direct to your non dmz-ed system, is just begging to be hacked, and it will be, without a shadow of doubt.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      In what sense is this “opening a direct tunnel?”

      I don’t think you really understand what’s going on here; or otherwise, I don’t.

      I’ve used BOINC without issue for over a decade.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As far as I know, the BOINC client just pulls down new data for processing when each batch of work is done. There’s no pushing and no open tunnel or port. The software risk would be malicious code in a particular project (e.g. if it said it was folding proteins but actually mined bitcoins). I hope there’s some vetting of project code.

      The other risk is hardware (especially CPU and RAM) running its lifetime down more quickly because of the continual heavier usage.