• starman2112
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No, nothing about what Jose said implies that they wouldn’t want women to be allowed to wear a hijab. This gesture is possible because Islam forces women to keep their head covered when they’re around men. If they were allowed to uncover their head around men, then this gesture would hold no weight.

    in places like Iran women face repression if they want to not wear hijab, and the western countries working towards the opposite sentiment of repression for wearing hijab.

    Stop making these stupid comparisons. Iran imprisons women if they choose not to wear hijabs. Western countries offer women the option not to.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      6 months ago

      There is bans of hijabs in many places. A few years back France infamously banned wearing them to the beaches and arrested women for refusing it.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/burkini-ban-why-is-france-arresting-muslim-women-for-wearing-fullbody-swimwear-and-why-are-people-so-angry-a7207971.html

      Earlier this month a women in Germany was banned from court service for refusing to take of her hijab. The EU court ruled that banning women from wearing scarfes in the work place is legal, if it is embedded in a “neutrality policy”

      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/24/muslim-women-struggle-with-germanys-hijab-ban-in-workplaces

      It is not on the same level like in Iran, but as i said they are moving towards it, step by step.

      • starman2112
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Fuck right off. Not being allowed on a beach or to work in jobs that necessitate no favor towards any particular groups is not the same as being fucking tortured and imprisoned.

        • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Which i never said. But this is the direction we are heading, if we don’t stop it know. If you take a care to look at history you will see that repression never was just flipped on and off. It is always a gradual shift and it needs to be stopped in the beginning and every increase of repressions need to be seen in the context that there is a threat of it worsening. And oh boy will it be worsening with the current traction of fascist and far right politicians in the West.

          This is the same reason why we need to defend all marginalized groups and their rights and not be selective. If it becomes more okay to repress Muslims more, it will become more okay to repress LGBT more again. It will become more okay to repress Black and Brown people more again and it will become more okay to repress Jewish people more again.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Secular state is as bad as theocratic state, gotcha, hope you’ll get your gold medal this summer.

        • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          6 months ago

          If secular doesn’t mean to separate state and religion but to suppress freedom of religion then absolutely yes. Because a theocratic state is doing just the same.

          Also it is always ironic when states claim to be “secular” while having christian holidays as public holidays because “culture”.