• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1671 month ago

    They are taking measures to ensure its not too easy to impersonate other users. Seems like a good idea to me.

    • snownyte
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      Agreed. I know it must be inconvenient to come across this thing. But people have to realize, it is done for a reason.

      You wouldn’t want anyone to pretend they’re you online and ruining your credibility and reputation.

    • KalciferOP
      link
      English
      -551 month ago

      That certainly does seem to be their goal, but, imo, it’s a bit extreme — especially given the context.

        • KalciferOP
          link
          English
          -381 month ago

          Just the environment where the impersonations are theorized to take place — given the type of people who likely use the service, the ways people interract on the site, what the site is used for… imo, it seems unlikely that changing an “a” to a “4” is going to result in a damaging impersonation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            461 month ago

            It’s a nigligible inconvenience for a significant increase in security. This sort of situation has happened before where different numbers and symbols are used to pass off as other users in online communities.

            • KalciferOP
              link
              English
              331 month ago

              It’s a nigligible inconvenience

              This community is called Mildly Infruating, after all 😜

              • kratoz29
                link
                fedilink
                English
                271 month ago

                I think you mildly infuriated some users here.

                • radfrog
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -21 month ago

                  And nigligible didn’t? You just got wooshed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1271 month ago

    In Wikimedia projects (and MediaWiki systems in general) you actually have to pay attention to other people’s usernames (when working with histories and in article discussions), and at least in Wikipedia long long time ago there was a lot of trolling/vandalism where people impersonated other users (particularly the admins) and made bunch of sockpuppets with tiny variations in names when they got banned. So this rule makes sense.

  • Carighan Maconar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    891 month ago

    That’s actually really cool that they do that. Reduces the ability of people to scam because they cannot pick intentionally-similar usernames.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Defense against homoglyph attacks is a good thing. I’m sure they haven’t had a big issue, but they have a homoglyph detector and that’s a great idea. More systems should implement a generalized homoglyph detector.

    Kudos to wikibooks

    Kalcifer KaIclfer Kaloifer Кalcifer

    Etc…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 month ago

      I tried out.

      All the options you give are allowed, only what OP shows gives the error. While it seems like a good idea, seems the implementation is terrible and only filters out the most obvious ones.

    • KalciferOP
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ha, that username is apparently not allowed. They require that a username contain at least one letter.