Soft paywall, more of a minor speedbump.

This is hard to dismiss as a mere “hit piece”. The main point is some people expressing concern that one erratic person, sometimes seemingly pro-Russian, has so much control over important infrastructure. The main example is Ukraine, but Taiwan is mentioned too. Despite measured negativity, it is also mentioned how Starlink has helped Ukraine, with a positive comment from Ukraine’s digital minister.

It also has some nice animations and pictures (though the Starlink interconnect diagram looks hopelessly wrong).

  • kinttach@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m surprised the Starlink satellites don’t have cameras and sell realtime imaging as a product. It seems like a natural way for SpaceX to increase revenue and become indispensable to governments around the world. Or maybe they do and we just don’t know about it.

    • pigeonberry@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can only speculate on reasons. Cameras would add mass and energy consumption, and they’re already launching a lot fewer satellites per launch as it is. I suspect that good imaging requires a lot of specialist knowledge and experience, like how to build lenses and sensors, and what frequencies of light to look at (visible? infrared? radar?), and how to do destriping and other image cleanup. There are already other companies with satellites in low orbits with frequent imaging and sales channels to customers, so I don’t think SpaceX would have that much of competitive edge (except having more satellites). Some Earth imaging is provided by governments for free, says Wikipedia’s Satellite imagery, including Landsat, MODIS, and ASTER for the U.S. alone. There are lots of private providers with high resolution, like down to 41 cm, so they probably have big imaging systems on their satellites.

      • grahamsz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I understand it, the super high resolution satellites have to be super large because you run into optical limits on the lens structure. The Maxar 30cm resolution ones are the size of a small school bus.

        While there’s probably a market for imagery that’s low resolution and ultra-fast refresh, it’d still add mass and complicate things and starlink is already a complicated project.

        I half expect the next move will be space-based datacenters. I can imagine twitter’s new owner seeing the benefits in hosting entirely outside the jurisdiction of any government.

        • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I half expect the next move will be space-based datacenters.

          The thermal management would be a nightmare

        • pigeonberry@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe that international treaties require that each orbiting object be marked with the responsible nation, and that that nation has jurisdiction over it. I don’t know how the International Space Station is handled. I could probably quickly search for it, but I shouldn’t be spending time on this at the moment anyway (working hours).

          • grahamsz@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, though honestly Elon could actually make his own country at this point and/or launch from international water.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to like elon but after watching him handle Twitter he seems to be getting more and more unstable. Every headline I see about him I think this guy is terminally online.

    • s4if@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here… bring back early-spacex elon. It seems like he forgot about his dream colonizing mars and focusing on destroying the world instead. sigh.

      • 🐱TheCat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was just better concealed behind the propaganda. he’s always been a POS

        • s4if@lemmy.my.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, if he is always a fraud from the start, he wouldn’t be able to save Tesla and make SpaceX very dominant technologically like today.
          He become real shit after pandemic. He feels like a god because spacex successes and Tesla’s stock somehow balooned while others tanked. Then it goes downhill from there. From his defiance against covid protocol, his participation on crypto shit, twitter saga, etc. He is in a state when he think he can bend reality according to his will. And he will try to prove it at the cost of everything he has. Sigh.

    • rexxit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Howard Hughes syndrome? Becoming rich enough to involve the news reading public in your mania…

    • baked_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shown on many occasions in the last years

          • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Honestly, what? You’re just making stuff up. If he was in favor of Russia he’d have never given access to Starlink in the first place. That was a huge strategic advantage for Ukraine.

            SpaceX spent 100 million on supporting Ukraine. I don’t think any other company has funded Ukraine’s defense efforts with that amount of money

            • baked_tea
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              He is a con and his fans cucks watching him try to fuck everyone over