• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Most are referring to the way our current electoral system works. Voting 3rd party helps the Republicans even if its not intentional.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Obligatory: “Ranked Choice” is a specific use of ranked ballots. It’s subpar. It beats what we’re doing now, but anything beats what we’re doing now.

        What you want is a Condorcet method like Ranked Pairs, where the winner is whoever beats everyone else. RCV just picks whoever can scrounge together 50% first. RCV would not elect a candidate who is literally everyone’s second choice. Ranked Pairs would.

        The simple alternative is Approval Voting, where you let people check all the names they like. It matches Condorcet results… somehow. There is no good reason we’re not using it everywhere.

        • Seraph@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Approval Voting seems to just dilute your vote the more candidates you vote for. Candidates will tell people people to only place one vote. What a silly system.

          • mindbleach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Your worst-case scenario is how things currently work.

            Realistically, people will just ignore that shite advice, and vote for as many people as they feel like. It works out on average.

        • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          But ranked choice is easy to implement and in practice if everyone would put a candidate second they aren’t likely to be knocked out in the first round. There are very limited practical examples where it doesn’t provide the optimal outcome.

          It also seems to have some level of support and momentum in the US and it seems to me like it’d be better not to get caught in the weeds fighting over which new voting system should be implemented there.

          • mindbleach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Approval is trivial.

            Ranked Pairs has the same ballots as Ranked Choice and it works the way people think ranked ballots work.

            RCV has momentum primarily because people keep using the name to mean “ranked ballots.”

    • AlDente
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is absurd. Take a look at the polls. There is only one 3rd-party candidate with double digit percentages. Do you really think JFK is taking more votes from Biden than Trump?

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Taking the risk because you think you know something you can’t know is what’s absurd

        • AlDente
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I never made any indication on how I’m voting. I’m just tired of this baseless claim that voting 3rd party only helps Trump. Polls excluding 3rd-parties show Trump significantly further ahead than those with 3rd-parties. Therefore, Biden’s only chance of winning is due to JFK capturing conservative votes.

            • AlDente
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              What is “how America works” in this context? You seem to be trying to make the point that 3rd-party voting only hurts Biden. I’m pointing to recent polling that shows that, when 3rd-party options are included, Biden’s margins get closer to victory. You should be thanking 3rd-parties if you are hoping for a Biden victory.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                So polling, that thing that told us trump couldn’t have won in 2016, makes another prediction, eh?

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe. A lot of folks only know him for his good environmental stance and see him as the rightful Democrat candidate.

        They don’t see his antivax bullshit and leaky brain from WiFi.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        A different way to think about it - most of the intended audience on Lemmy, and especially in this community, would’ve voted democrat instead of republican. So from the frame of reference of this post, most folks here claiming to vote third party did in fact have their vote “taken” from Biden.