Cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20086798


During 2013–2017, casualty rates per 100 million miles were 5.16 (95% CI 4.92 to 5.42) for E- HE vehicles and 2.40 (95%CI 2.38 to 2.41) for ICE vehicles, indicating that collisions were twice as likely (RR 2.15; 95% CI 2.05 to 2.26) with E-HE vehicles. Poisson regression found no evidence that E-HE vehicles were more dangerous in rural environments (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11); but strong evidence that E-HE vehicles were three times more dangerous than ICE vehicles in urban environments (RR 2.97; 95% CI 2.41 to 3.7). Sensitivity analyses of missing data support main findings.


  • “Pedestrian safety on the road to net zero: cross-sectional study of collisions with electric and hybrid-electric cars in Great Britain”. Phil J Edwards, Siobhan Moore, Craig Higgins. 2024-05-21. J Epidemiol Community Health.
  • [PDF] (archive)
    • nehal3m
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pedestrians are faced with a choice: Funky-ass beats or funky ass-beats!

    • Gladaed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Already the case in europe. There are fake motor noise loud speakers to make evs noticable.

      • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is also true in the US since being phased in from 2019-2020. All new models since that time have low speed warning sound requirements.