Cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20086798


During 2013–2017, casualty rates per 100 million miles were 5.16 (95% CI 4.92 to 5.42) for E- HE vehicles and 2.40 (95%CI 2.38 to 2.41) for ICE vehicles, indicating that collisions were twice as likely (RR 2.15; 95% CI 2.05 to 2.26) with E-HE vehicles. Poisson regression found no evidence that E-HE vehicles were more dangerous in rural environments (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11); but strong evidence that E-HE vehicles were three times more dangerous than ICE vehicles in urban environments (RR 2.97; 95% CI 2.41 to 3.7). Sensitivity analyses of missing data support main findings.


  • “Pedestrian safety on the road to net zero: cross-sectional study of collisions with electric and hybrid-electric cars in Great Britain”. Phil J Edwards, Siobhan Moore, Craig Higgins. 2024-05-21. J Epidemiol Community Health.
  • [PDF] (archive)
  • KalciferOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    especially given safety features that now exist on newer cars

    Do note that the dataset that they used is from 2013-2017.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Interesting. When did they start adding noise to low speed EVs? I wonder how this analysis would look for newer vehicles.

      • KalciferOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        When did they start adding noise to low speed EVs?

        At least 2016 (in the USA) [source (archive)].