Jakdracula@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agox last nightlemmy.worldimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up12Karrow-down165file-text
arrow-up11.93Karrow-down1imagex last nightlemmy.worldJakdracula@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square114fedilinkfile-text
I posted this earlier today in the tech lemmy instance, but, they have no sense of humor and deleted it. I’m trying here.
minus-squareMaxPow3r11@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down2·1 year agoThey spelled EAT wrong.
minus-squarefidodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoThe joke is that Twitter put a giant X Sign on the roof of their building so the edit needs to include an X
minus-squareDavidRay@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoNope, T A X is an acceptable alternative spelling for E A T.
minus-squareRobaque@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoNah, for them, taxes would just be another small hurdle to squash
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoMake it a tiered hurdle: top tier, above $1M, 98% income taxes.
minus-squareResol van Lemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoTaxing the rich, and then eating them. What could possibly go wrong?
They spelled EAT wrong.
The joke is that Twitter put a giant X Sign on the roof of their building so the edit needs to include an X
Nope, T A X is an acceptable alternative spelling for E A T.
Nah, for them, taxes would just be another small hurdle to squash
Make it a tiered hurdle: top tier, above $1M, 98% income taxes.
deleted by creator
¿Por que no los dos?
Taxing the rich, and then eating them. What could possibly go wrong?