Former President Donald Trump was indicted for an unprecedented third time on August 1, adding another set of serious federal charges to the mounting legal issues he faces.

  • Kinyutaka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even after he is behind bars. Crazy as it sounds, he can run for President from prison.

    Not very effectively, but he can run.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      One presidential candidate got 3.4% (more than all 3rd party candidates in 2020 combined) of the vote (over 1million votes) as a third party candidate while in prison in 1920.

        • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It makes sense though. Think about it like this, A politician that wanted to stay in power could disqualify his opponents by wielding the DOJ as a personal tool and nailing them with felony charges. Trump could have placed a more loyal attorney general, nailed Biden on some bullshit petty offense that technically qualifies as a felony, and have his name removed from the ballot shortly before the election. Allowing felons to run for president defangs that particular power move. To disqualify someone the 14th amendment would have to be invoked, and should be in Trump’s case.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            A politician that wanted to stay in power could disqualify his opponents by wielding the DOJ as a personal tool and nailing them with felony charges

            It’s how Putin and other despots have been doing it for a very long time.

          • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            While I do see the validity of this argument, it still feels like treating the symptoms rather than the cause. If the fear is a sitting president welding his personal power to imprison (and thus disqualify) a political rival, isn’t the bigger problem that a sitting president has the power to do this in the first place?

            • BlinkAndItsGone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The Justice Department has to be able to indict people, that’s part of its function. And the DoJ is part of the executive branch. A good President will not use the DoJ for his personal political purposes, but the incentive to do so, if it was there, would be extremely powerful. I think it’s probably a good idea to remove it. If the people can’t be trusted not to vote for a criminal or a traitor, we have bigger problems.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve heard the logic is to prevent people from wanting to retroactively legalize shit to secure votes from felons, which doesn’t make a lot of sense tbh

    • rollerbang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Weird. I’ve heard of Americans losing their right to vote when imprisoned and yet they could run for office?

      • vaultdweller013
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably just an overlooked aspect, it woulf be too much of a pain to run for office while im prison. Even for a lot of the rich and powerful.

      • FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        If he wins, he pardons himself from federal crimes then uses his powers as Commander in Chief to break himself out of prison for state crimes, thereby creating the ultimate constitutional crisis and tearing the country apart.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Whether or not he can pardon himself is up for debate. So if the founding fathers intended that you can assume office from prison there would be a more defined method.

          • Neoncamouflage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            36
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or we need to admit that the founding fathers may not have predicted literally every possible circumstance to arise in the future hundreds of years.

          • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was intentional that you can run and be elected as president from prison. It’s written about contemporaneously. They knew the risk of allowing a president, or administration, jailing their political opponents.

            What’s not clear is if it was meant for a president to be able to pardon themselves. I personally would think not, but many think it’s permissable.