Russia converted a captured Ukrainian tank into a remote controlled vehicle that uses a similar FPV control concept as many kamikaze drones.

  • tal@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    My kneejerk response when I saw this was “it probably doesn’t make a lot of sense”, in that a tank is designed for human use.

    Like, a lot of the constraints that tanks are built to are because they need to have humans onboard.

    Like, if you don’t need people onboard, you’d build a tank differently. You could make the thing a lot smaller. Same reason that, for example, UAVs generally don’t look a lot like manned aircraft.

    But one thing that I did wonder about…I know that Russia has a number of really elderly tanks. They’ve been reactivating T-54s. Those are not going to have great protection against modern weapons on the modern battlefield. But…if they aren’t great in their original role, but could be converted to be unmanned, make them more-attritable, that might make more sense.

    The article also mentioned the possibility of converting “older vehicles” at the very end (though it spent more time talking about specialized unmanned vehicles, like mine-rollers).

    • whyNotSquirrel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      but when did they care about human life before the military material? They never hesitate to send people to their death so I don’t see why they would develop this, or they start getting low on meatbag?

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        6 months ago

        They have had manpower issues. You don’t trick Cubans and people from South Asia to fight for you if you have a glut of domestic soldiers

    • gravitas_deficiency
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m pretty sure T-54s don’t have autoloaders, and that’s a significant (and likely deeply un-economical) retrofit.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Still could see some use though, in that if they’re not very combat capable anyway, driving them around potentially makes one expend ammo firing at them, and any mines they might hit would be detonated without human casualty.

        • gravitas_deficiency
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Frankly, it would be more useful to just use them as short-range artillery than that. Single-shot RC tanks sound like they’d be a complete waste.

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Warfare is also always a technical competition on who can build the next ultimate deterrent. Remote and AI controlled weapons are soon the big advantage