• Zeppo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    He claims it isn’t true, but they did a $250k settlement with her. Hmmm.

      • PahassaPaikassa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can get one for free if you want. Theres still wild horse populations.

        But if you want, you can spend hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions on a horse. You could also probably get one for a few hundred but that one is already on its way to a glue factory.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          5 months ago

          There are very, very few wild horses, and they’re pretty much untamable. But there are TONS of feral horses with populations growing out of control and governments at a loss for what to do about it

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            What’s the difference between a wild and a feral horse? Isn’t going feral just kinda like going back to being a wild animal?

            • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Yes, but it comes from a domesticated genetic line. Imagine if a Pug or Chihuahua went feral. It wouldn’t exactly be the same as the original wolf-like starting point.

              It’s the same with horses. After generations of being bred by humans for specific traits, they’re very different than the original wild population. They’re probably also easier to re-domesticate than wild horses.

              • lanolinoil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                But… there were no horses in the Americas until colonization (sort of) – Is there still a difference between feral and wild in the new world?

                • BossDj@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  They are all feral by definition in the new world (although I’ve never read about your link before!)

                  Legislative BS that requires public opinion often refers to them as wild (because it plays to romanticizing) or they are sometimes labeled wild just to categorize how they will be treated by land and animal controllers (so they are considered “natural” in some areas). Before like the 70s, they were treated as pests and killed, but people thought they were cool and pretty, so it had to stop.

                  Arizona had always had a shitty time because the horse populations destroy the environment, but when parks people tried to thin or remove them, people complained because horses are pretty.

              • DaBPunkt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                5 months ago

                The Przewalski’s horse is not the wild form of our horse. It’s a other sub species (a little bit like the zebra or the donkey) with (for example) another chromosome count. Another problem is that there are evidences that the modern Przewalski’s horse feraled from a domesticate form of the primal Przewalski’s horse (that was tamed by the Botai culture). A further problem is that the Przewalski’s horse was extincted in the wild for decades and only survived because of human breeding (so it was kind of tamed again).

        • lanolinoil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          What? Off of BLM land or something? No one is going to let you steal wild horses off their land I suspect.

          Surely I can’t just go grab a bunch of wild animals anymore – it’s not 1850

        • Duranie@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Boarding, farrier, vet, plus the mental and emotional toll of owning a 1000lb toddler that exhibits an inverse correlation of majestic beauty and intelligence. God, I love horses lol.

        • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          I dated a girl who had two horses and she was shaving every expense to keep her horses well where she was selling plasma. After noping out that relationship after a month, my friends explained to me the whole “Horse Girl” stereotype and every single one matched.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Settlements are always necessarily dispositive of the truth. Sometimes it makes sense to just pay a settlement fee than to go through litigation if you expect your attorney fees to be greater than the settlement cost. Also it’s not uncommon for settlements agreements to not confirm allegations so as to not benefit future cases against the defendant.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        “My commitment: We will never seek victory in a just case against us, even if we will probably win,” he wrote. “We will never surrender/settle an unjust case against us, even if we will probably lose.”

        Either he’s full of shit, he did after a horse for sex or both.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        On one hand it might be cost effective but on the other its not like cost is an issue for someone with like ten zeoes in his account balance. Maybe he thought getting it out of the news cycle was more important then how it would look becoming a thing… too bad lol

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Probably rationalized it as being cheaper than legal fees + additional damage to his reputation from a public trial.

      Or it happened and he’d have lost.