• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11813 days ago

    I really thought this was about the DirectX compatibility layer for Linux and was hopelessly lost until a dozen sentences in.

    • RBG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4313 days ago

      See, I have the same issue the other way around. Hearing about Proton supporting games on Linux makes me always wonder how I can play games via my webmail account.

    • Beaver
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1313 days ago

      Well, proton mail and proton compatibility are both awesome tools.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5913 days ago

    So they’re adopting a similar structure to OpenAI, a for-profit company majority controlled by a non-profit organization.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12813 days ago

      Similar structure, yes, but this is the important part:

      Swiss foundations and their board of trustees are legally obligated to act in accordance with the purpose for which they were established

      So, just like the Louvre museum in Paris and the Luxor casino in Las Vegas have similar structures, pointing this out doesn’t really contribute much to the discussion.

      For all I know, OpenAI’s purpose is to create Skynet and kill all humans. But Proton’s is:

      Our legally binding purpose is to further the advancement of privacy, freedom, and democracy around the world.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        English
        3413 days ago

        And this might actually get me to use Proton. I’m currently with Tuta, and the experience there is… just okay. I went with them because they claim to have even less access to my stuff vs Proton, and Proton being private didn’t get me to trust them enough to use them instead (I’ve used them in the past though). But this structural change might convince me that they’re trustworthy enough to switch to.

        We’ll see how it turns out. I’m still giving Tuta a shot because I like the idea of not bundling everything together, but once I get my NextCloud setup working, I’ll decide how much of Proton I’ll actually need, compare prices, etc.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          213 days ago

          How is it possible to have less data on your than Proton? I’m not aware of anything Proton has which isn’t fundamentally required.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea
            link
            English
            813 days ago

            Proton stores email subject lines unencrypted to facilitate search, Tuta does search client-side so everything can be completely encrypted. Both have access to unencrypted email when they receive it, so it’s not a huge difference, but given the cost difference, I figured I’d give Tuta a try first.

              • @sugar_in_your_tea
                link
                English
                413 days ago

                Not great. I have a couple hundred or so, and it’s already a bit slow on my phone.

              • @sugar_in_your_tea
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                I don’t think that’s true. They can always do PGP on the client after decrypting the email (so double-encrypt). It’s also not particularly interesting because almost nobody uses PGP. It’s a design decision that I’m not a big fan of, but if they’re legally obligated to maintain my privacy, maybe I’m okay with it. I’ll give it some time and see how that pans out.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  113 days ago

                  OpenPGP is actively supported by dozens of clients, they cannot and do not encrypt subjects, so Proton chose to be compatible with that. I think dismissing cross-compatibility because of a hand wave “nobody uses it” isn’t very productive either.

    • @fruitycoder
      link
      English
      813 days ago

      And Mozilla/Firefox

      Its pretty common.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Really wish they transitioned to a “Not-for-profit” structure, rather than non-profit. Non-profits can still be profit driven, sadly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4413 days ago

      They specifically chose non-profit because it allows them to remain profit driven, and continue to run the company as they have. The non-profit is the main shareholder now, and required by law to act in the interest of its founding principles. They basically did this for PR, because now, working in their customers’ best interests is mandatory, and they are protected against hostile takeovers

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 days ago

        Weren’t they protected before? Afaik their major shareholder was the Swiss government.