• Ookami38
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sure, let’s start with not making armed thugs the first line of defense. Your average traffic cop, contrary to what the bastards will say, doesn’t need a gun. The presence of one only intensifies the situation.

    Easy counterpoint: traffic stops are dangerous!

    Counter to the counterpoint: they’re only dangerous because cops are jumpy. A person being pulled over for a traffic stop is being interrupted - UNDER THREAT OF STATE SANCTIONED VIOLENCE for what most likely boils down to either a speeding ticket or an excuse to ID the driver. Naturally someone in that situation may do something rash.

    Wellness checks. Those are a big one, too. Glen’s suicidal, got his gun to his head? What should we do? Call 911 obviously! They’ll send out someone with some mental health training. A paramedic at least! What do you mean they sent out a jacked up jackboot who won’t stop shouting “drop your weapon”? He’s already got a gun pointing at his own head, what’s another gun do to help this situation?

    I’m not a legal scholar. I don’t claim to have all of the answers, and honestly yes - an armed protection force is probably a necessity, from a societal safety standpoint, but they absolutely do not need to be the first line.

    • Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been arguing for reform and regulations being a better answer chanting taunts in the other comments.

      I agree with all of your proposals, especially the mental health suggestion.

      People desperately need mental health and well-being support in the states.