• minibyte
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    If it’s a traffic violation you have a good chance of the cop no showing to court.

        • Instigate@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          5 months ago

          I challenged a licence suspension in Australia when I was 19 years old. I gladly paid the $560 fine but I would’ve lost my licence for three months because I was driving 7km/h over the limit on a ‘double-demerits’ weekend. The magistrate sent me to a fortnightly driver’s course for 12 weeks, all the while I kept my licence, and after the course was over I fronted court again and successfully argued my three month suspension down to four weeks.

          I’m pretty sure that going to court over traffic violations is a thing in any country that allows going to court over traffic violations.

          FYI in most Australian jurisdictions, you can’t demand that the individual police officer who fined you attend court to defend themselves. That part is most likely a US thing.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            5 months ago

            All that over 7kmh? Holy shit, most cops in the usa won’t bother you doing 9mph over on highways and like 5-7mph on normal roads.

            • Instigate@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah, I was on my P-plates (provisional licence) at the time where you have can have up to seven demerit points before losing your licence. As a P-plater, every speeding offence automatically is moderated to the maximum value, four points, and because it was a ‘double-demerits’ weekend (for public holidays), that four points was doubled to eight points. I received more demerit points than km/h I was over the limit.

              For reference, if I was on my full licence and it wasn’t double-demerits, it would have been one point out of a total twelve. Instead, I got eight points which suspended my licence. Thankfully the magistrate I had was reasonable and granted my reduction - that also meant I didn’t have to pay court costs and I represented myself, so the whole thing cost me the initial $35 court booking fee. I managed to get something that resembled justice out of it, but I’ll still have a bitter taste in my mouth because of the whole rigamarole for a long time to come.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s insane, it’s not like you were reckless driving, and what the hell is a double demerits weekend? How is that even fair, like the weekend magically makes moving violations worse somehow. I’m all for being stricter here in the USA for our licensing requirements, but it sounds like you guys in aussie land went a little to far.

                • Instigate@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The logic is that road deaths go up during holiday periods (which is sadly a statistical fact here) so they ramp up enforcement and double the penalties for those periods to try to correct for it. I’m not a huge fan of the idea, but from a purely statistical and scientific standpoint it does at least make some amount of sense. My individual circumstance is a bit of a curveball because my punishment was way outstripping my crime, but I do have some understanding for the idea of double demerits. I think my issue was that what should have been a one-point offence (doubled to two points) became an eight-point offence just because I was on a provisional licence. That part I’m still very salty about.

                  • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    As a total stranger who who doesn’t know you a dot, I can totally unemotional and impartially say that you received justice.

                    Speed kills, literally. And as an inexperienced driver, you shouldn’t be speeding a dot. Let alone anyone else.

                    If a kid had run out from behind a parked car, tree or whatever then you have a much better chance of not killing them if you’re going the speed limit.

                    The fact that you were even caught, while armed with all the knowledge you have about increased deaths and thus increased demerits, tells me you should have made better choices.

                    I have been caught speeding 3 times in my 20 years of driving and I deserved every single one of them, and more.

                    That you were able to further reduce your punishment is further evidence of the system working.

                    Frankly I think your posts reveal an attitude of a victim rather than a perpetrator, which is a shame because you should probably have taken away something about the need to not speed in order to not kill people.

                    Everyone thinks they’re a great driver, and no one thinks it’s going to be them who has the accident that kills someone. But that’s the thing about accidents, they’re unpredictable and undesired.

                    All that said and done- if you were speeding by less than 10% I think it’s harsh and I’m glad you got to reduce the punishment! Over here we have 20mph zones to protect kids and 7kmh over is inexcusable in my book.

            • sugar_in_your_tea
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yup. Cops in my area usually won’t bother if you’re under 10mph over (16kph), though maybe they’d drop that in a school zone. 7kmk is pretty much nothing…

        • best_username_ever
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          5 months ago

          French guy here: I went to court once because the cop lied and needed tickets for his quota. I had all the proofs. The judge basically told me “I don’t give a fuck, you pay.” It’s useless.

        • Moghul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not as much of a thing but people do object fines, most commonly mail-in fines when the owner wasn’t driving.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      And if it’s below $1000, people often represent themselves because everyone knows lawyers are too expensive to justify it.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yup, and most tickets in my area are like $100-150, assuming it’s just speeding and not insanely fast (i.e. <20mph over, most cops will cut it to 10 over on a first violation).

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not around here. Cops live for traffic court. They sit around all day doing very little.