Four Missouri elk hunters used [a stepladder] to climb over an invisible corner from one parcel of Bureau of Land Management terrain to another. They never touched a toe on two adjacent swaths of private property marked by “No Trespassing” signs.

But to the owner of that property, a North Carolina multimillionaire whose portfolio includes 22,000 acres of this game-rich mountain, the hunters’ aerial corner-cross was trespassing all the same. Whether he is correct — and the extent to which private property rights can thwart the public’s ability to access its land on thousands of similar corners — is now being weighed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver.

  • BakedGoods
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Not extreme at all. What’s extreme is the “mUh pRuPuRtY” of Americans. I could probably go a year without hearing the word property used in my native tongue but when listening to Americans, it’s every other word out of their mouths.

    • ryathal
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right to roam would require major liability reform and a massive reduction in lawyers in the US. Overzealous lawyers have ruined a lot of things in the US.