• waigl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    Does that thing have a big turntable under there somewhere? Because from the photo, it looks like it can shoot in exactly or almost exactly the direction the rails happen to be pointing, and if you need to shoot somewhere more than two or three degrees to either side, you’re SOL…

    • sanpedropeddler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      It doesn’t look like it. They did sometimes use a kind of turntable to allow regular cannons to easily change direction, but I don’t think the same was done with these.

      • raoul@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe it’s because of the recoil?

        Having the canon alligned with the track allows it to move with the recoil while having it slightly angled may make it derail 🤷‍♂️

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Siege of Petersburg, I believe, so trading fire between two relatively static lines.

  • espentan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Back when a solid plank was all I took to protect you from rifle fire. Or does the encasing serve some other purpose, perhaps?

    • Boinkage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It also serves as a bike ramp. The Confederate soldiers were well known for their love of BMX tricks.

    • sanpedropeddler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wood still wasn’t strong enough to sustain a lot of fire even from those rifles. The confederacy just didn’t have enough iron.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s some pretty thick wood at a good angle. Maybe there’s a mythbusters, but I’d expect it could protect against small arms fire of the day.

          • espentan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            The fourth guy from the right looks so confident; oh yeah, you think you got what it takes? Bring it!

        • sanpedropeddler
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wood is definitely better than nothing, but I don’t really see a situation in which this thing would need protection against small arms anyway. Unless something has already gone horribly wrong, those small arms are a significant distance from your artillery. At that range, they are already effectively worthless because their lack of rifling makes them horribly inaccurate.

          If I had to guess, you would mainly be worried about union sharpshooters (maybe) and artillery. At that point the only real advantage of the wood is the obstruction of sight.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            The standard rifled muskets of the time actually had a range of about a kilometer.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Kinda looks like one of those turtle tanks (blyatmobiles) that are showing up now in the Russian-Ukrainian War.