Applicants for German citizenship will be required to explicitly affirm Israel’s right to exist under a new citizenship law which came into effect on Tuesday.

The new law shortened the number of years that a person must have lived in Germany in order to obtain a passport, from eight to five years. It will also allow first-generation migrants to be dual citizens.

As part of the shake-up, new questions were added to the country’s citizenship test, including about Judaism and Israel’s right to exist.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    These statistic say little as the German police does not properly distinguish between antisemitism and anti-zionism.

    But regardless, if you are so extreme in your views that you can’t accept the existence of the state of Israel in some shape or form, you are probably not a good fit for German society.

    • gigachad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m not sure what you want to imply here. I do not see the benefit in asking the offender why they beat up the Jewish person.

      I cited numbers from a study by RIAS (Wiki, German), this is not from a police statistic.

      The study distinguishes Isreal-related antisemitism, meaning the incidents were directed against the Jewish state of Israel and denied its legitimacy. This kind of antisemitism was 52%.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Incidence does not mean “beating up” someone. Spray painting “stop the genocide in Gaza” is sometimes counted as an “antisemitic incidence” in Germany.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 months ago

              by any definition

              The IHRA’s definition does, so you can’t say “any”.

              That said, the IHRA definition was pretty specifically created to be zionist and a shield for Israel, and should be rejected on those grounds.

            • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The definition used by German authorities subsumes antizionism, i.e. denying Israel’s right to exist as a special form of antisemitism.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                6 months ago

                It is quite reductive to say anti-zionism is just denying the right of Israel to exist. Yes, the state of Israel is a deeply zionist project but you can accept the reality of this state existing and still be opposed to the idea of zionism in general.

                I am opposed to the idea of colonialism in general but still accept the existence of states with a colonial history.

                • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  That’s a good point. I’ve always thought antizionism and denying Israel’s right to exist where somehow identical.