• CaptainEffort
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Depends on if the publisher is scummy or not. BG3 and Elden Ring were $60.

      Even then tho, this game was $60 back in 2010. Releasing for the same price 14 years later is insane, not even EA would pull that.

      • subignition@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I mean, technically, it’s cheaper now because of inflation, but that’s more pedantic than even I care to be

        but yeah, last few nintendo games have been $70 I think so there have been rumors that it’s the new norm for the big N

        • kinkles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Last few? I just browsed the front page of the Eshop and there was only one $70 Nintendo title.

          • subignition@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I know totk was one, I guess I just assumed that a few more had come out at that price point

        • CaptainEffort
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Eh, the inflation argument never moved me for a variety of reasons. But either way, if that’s true then the first part of my comment applies.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yup with inflation the $60 would be somewhere between $80-85 dollars equivalent in buying power.

          So its technically cheaper. $60 today is $40-45, 14 years ago.