• Icalasari@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        No it isn’t, that’s like saying, “Don’t feel sad” is a double negative

        A double negative is something like, “Don’t not do that”

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          5 months ago

          Honestly, I’m reading it as a triple negative. I wasn’t planning on nitpicking it, but “force through” falls under the negative category for me.

          • toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I feel like you’re still thinking of the wrong kind of “negative”. It has multiple meanings, in this case, a synonym of “no”.

            • over_clox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think almost all articles like this are deliberately written in a confusing manner. 60 to 31?

              Anti … Ban …?

              60 whats to 31 whats?

              Yes, after reading things over twice, I gather 60 republicans to 31 democrats, or something like that, but hell why do political articles have to be written in such a confusing way?

              • Valthorn@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s a pretty standard way to write 60 votes for to 31 votes against, but again, since your comment has negative votes means you actually understood that. Negations, man. How do they work?

            • over_clox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Also, double negative…

              Anti-trans ban? That’s a double negative, when cancelling our the negatives, that means it’s pro-trans.

              Sorry but I think with the mathematical part of my brain. Throw two negatives into a sentence and they cancel out and become a positive.

              • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                mathematical part of my brain

                There’s no such thing. It’s just a gooey mass of billions of randomly firing neurons that can coalesce into patterns of signals and “brute force” answers to math problems. We are not logic machines with well defined mechanisms of functionality like a computer. We just fake it very well. That’s why we can make mistakes. A well built computer does not make mistakes.

              • Valthorn@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Anti-trans works as an adjective in this sentence, so it is a ban that is anti-trans in nature, not a ban of anti-trans behaviour.

                Your commiting a logical falacy believing that a double negative automatically means the same as no negative. “You are not allowed to not run” doesn’t mean that you are merely allowed to run, it means you must run.

                Buuut again, I assume your logic means the downvotes to your comment acts like a negation to your comment and so I’m not sure what you meant.

      • SreudianFlip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        No.

        Phobic describes the motivation for the act, which is a ban.