AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space to SneerClub@awful.systems · 5 months agoWe regret to inform you that Ray Kurzweil is back on his bullshitwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square370fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down12
arrow-up171arrow-down1external-linkWe regret to inform you that Ray Kurzweil is back on his bullshitwww.theguardian.comAllNewTypeFace@leminal.space to SneerClub@awful.systems · 5 months agomessage-square370fedilink
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoPosts you didn’t respond to: https://awful.systems/comment/3814271 https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/11260906 https://iosdev.space/users/jonhendry/statuses/112701199005570893 https://mastodon.me.uk/users/pikesley/statuses/112701122403652663
minus-squareVaryklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoYou’ve made several mistakes. The first quote isn’t responding to me as far as I can tell, and the following three already had answers from me when you wrote this. Maybe you were compiling these for a long time?
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoBlakestacey replied to you with a long list of fails that rolled into 2 posts that you didn’t reply to. Another you only said something like you took too long, I’m not replying.
minus-squareVaryklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoAh, I didn’t get that on my end. I’m sure it was…as reasoned and sturdy as the rest of these rebuttals have been.
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoPost the links to the replies you claim to have made. Lemmy.world still shows nothing.
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoYou made the claim you already replied to everyone. You provide the proof.
minus-squareVaryklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoEveryone else accepted the prior proof, your the only one still pretending not to understand and making up stories to avoid the report that you were incorrect. Kurzweil was accurate in most of his predictions. Thanks for helping prove that
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoSo your past claim you replied to them was a lie. You have dropped from entertaining troll to boring liar.
Posts you didn’t respond to:
https://awful.systems/comment/3814271
https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/11260906
https://iosdev.space/users/jonhendry/statuses/112701199005570893
https://mastodon.me.uk/users/pikesley/statuses/112701122403652663
You’ve made several mistakes.
The first quote isn’t responding to me as far as I can tell, and the following three already had answers from me when you wrote this.
Maybe you were compiling these for a long time?
Blakestacey replied to you with a long list of fails that rolled into 2 posts that you didn’t reply to.
Another you only said something like you took too long, I’m not replying.
Ah, I didn’t get that on my end.
I’m sure it was…as reasoned and sturdy as the rest of these rebuttals have been.
Post the links to the replies you claim to have made. Lemmy.world still shows nothing.
You couuuuld learn to scroll instead
You made the claim you already replied to everyone. You provide the proof.
Everyone else accepted the prior proof, your the only one still pretending not to understand and making up stories to avoid the report that you were incorrect.
Kurzweil was accurate in most of his predictions.
Thanks for helping prove that
So your past claim you replied to them was a lie.
You have dropped from entertaining troll to boring liar.