So you agree that Kurzweil’s 1999 prediction that by 2009 most consumer to business transactions would be with a virtual assistant that includes a realist human head was wrong.
You already argued that a webpage saying, “Thank you for your order.” Is an example of a virtual personality. However that was already refuted because websites did that before Kurzweil made his prediction in 1999. Therefore that isn’t what Kurzweil meant by a virtual personality.
That’s not a rebuttal.
Fail.
Wrong. Pass.
Still not a rebuttal.
Incorrect
Incorrect
Yes, that’s what I said…
So you agree that Kurzweil’s 1999 prediction that by 2009 most consumer to business transactions would be with a virtual assistant that includes a realist human head was wrong.
You’re misquoting the prediction to change parameters again.
This part:
is obviously correct.
“Often, the virtual presentation includes an animated visual presence that looks like a human face”
I guess this would also be correct, unless you are misinterpreting “often” to mean “most”.
You already argued that a webpage saying, “Thank you for your order.” Is an example of a virtual personality. However that was already refuted because websites did that before Kurzweil made his prediction in 1999. Therefore that isn’t what Kurzweil meant by a virtual personality.