AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space to SneerClub@awful.systems · 5 months agoWe regret to inform you that Ray Kurzweil is back on his bullshitwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square370fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down12
arrow-up171arrow-down1external-linkWe regret to inform you that Ray Kurzweil is back on his bullshitwww.theguardian.comAllNewTypeFace@leminal.space to SneerClub@awful.systems · 5 months agomessage-square370fedilink
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoGo for what? You said there were 100 correct predictions. When I asked you to show them you implied it was hyperbole. Then you repeated it. Show the list of 100 or admit it was a lie. I provided a list from his 1999 book of predictions for 2009. We argued the results. It was 25% accurate just like a 3rd party reporter concluded. If you want to claim his accuracy is better, you need a new list with sources.
minus-squareVaryklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoI admit what you said(and are saying) was based on lies and ignorance.
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoPlease give an example of a lie.
minus-squareVaryklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months ago“My phone is made entirely of jello”. That is an intentionally false statement, or a “lie”.
Go for what? You said there were 100 correct predictions. When I asked you to show them you implied it was hyperbole. Then you repeated it.
Show the list of 100 or admit it was a lie.
I provided a list from his 1999 book of predictions for 2009. We argued the results. It was 25% accurate just like a 3rd party reporter concluded.
If you want to claim his accuracy is better, you need a new list with sources.
I admit what you said(and are saying) was based on lies and ignorance.
Please give an example of a lie.
“My phone is made entirely of jello”.
That is an intentionally false statement, or a “lie”.