The lawsuit filed against Modded Hardware claims that Nintendo contacted Daly in March and threatened to sue him unless he stopped selling modded Switch consoles and MIG Switches (which enable pirated Switch games to be played on unmodded hardware).
According to Nintendo’s complaint, Daly agreed in March to stop selling the unauthorised devices, but continued to do so, claiming that he was looking for a new lawyer.
Nintendo therefore filed a complaint at a federal court in Seattle, accusing Daly of six charges including “trafficking in circumvention devices” and copyright infringement.
The lawsuit claims that Daly not only sold mods to customers, but also offered a mail-in service which enabled players to send in their Switch consoles and have them returned modded, often with pirated games installed.
“Defendant not only offers the hardware and firmware to create and play pirated games, but he also provides his customers with copies of pirated Nintendo games,” the platform holder’s complaint says.
“Typically, when a customer purchases a hacked console or the circumvention services, Defendant preinstalls on the console a portfolio of ready-to-play pirated games, including some of Nintendo’s most popular titles such as its Super Mario, The Legend of Zelda, and Metroid games.”
Nintendo is seeking financial damages from Daly, as well as the complete shutdown of his website. It also wants him “to deliver to NOA all circumvention devices, hacked consoles, and any other physical or digital copies of materials that infringe or violate any of NOA’s rights”.
“Defendant became a leading (if not the primary) moderator of the SwitchPirates Reddit community, which he helped grow to nearly 190,000 members,” Nintendo’s complaint says.
“Since 2019, Defendant has posted thousands of comments and messages to the SwitchPirates Reddit Group. Defendant’s posts have included, by way of example, messages directing users to the Pirate Shops […] and offering technical advice and encouragement to other users about how to use the Pirate Shops, how to download and install Circumvention Software, and how to play pirated copies of Nintendo Switch games.”
The complaint claims that Williams has been involved in three ‘pirate shops’ which have since been closed, and claims that a fourth is still active.
It also provides quotes of Williams stating on Reddit that he refuses to pay Nintendo money for its products.
“Defendant is well aware that his conduct is unlawful and infringes Nintendo’s intellectual property rights,” it says. “Indeed, Defendant has bragged publicly that he is a ‘pirate’ who ‘[isn’t] going to give Nintendo $50 for a game’.”
Highlighted Nintendo’s quotes.
I hate Nintendo’s practices as much as anyone else, but honestly, play stupid games and win stupid prizes. If you sell modded consoles with pirated games on them without even trying to be anonymous, of course they’re going to sue you and win.
Yes but the reddit mod James Williams aka Archbox didn’t do any of that. He ran a subreddit and also apparently some “stores” where you download games for free directly to your Switch. This is a major outlier, all the previous cases have only been triggered when money got involved.
Nintendo are trying to push for further precedent here and make things worse for consumers.
It’s not really setting a precedent, hosting pirated content has always been illegal and it doesn’t help that he bragged about being a pirate.
Money is already involved. It doesn’t need to be personal profit, my understanding is the lost sales are already enough for a copyright infringement claim. Although there are also three counts related to DMCA circumvention/trafficking – seems to me like Nintendo is confident they can prove in discovery that the defendant was close with / a part of the groups involved. (I am not a lawyer)
You should probably click through to the TorrentFreak article and skim the actual complaints.
For other readers, I’ll quote just a few lines of the complaint here:
[…] Defendant has engaged in “crowdsourcing” schemes, such as a scheme where he solicits members of the public to “donate” to his online community called “Missing Dumps” pre-paid Nintendo eShop Gift Cards (which he uses to purchase games to then copy and distribute) or copies of pirated Nintendo game files. He then rewards these contributors with special, enhanced access to the content available in his Pirate Shops.
Via the “SwitchPirates” Reddit board, Defendant has touted and advertised his Pirate Shops and offered technical advice and encouragement about how to obtain and play pirated Nintendo Switch games and use the Circumvention Software.
On March 31, 2024, Defendant acknowledged to NOA that his conduct violated NOA’s intellectual property rights, but refused to agree in writing to cease his unlawful activities. Moreover, upon receiving the cease-and-desist letter, Defendant apparently attempted to cover his tracks by systematically destroying the documentary evidence of his misconduct, including but not limited to deleting his Discord social media account as well as his GitHub account
(If the allegation that evidence was destroyed is true, that’s really not a good look lol)
Defendant has engaged in “crowdsourcing” schemes, such as a scheme where he solicits members of the public to “donate” to his online community
Ah OK then, money was involved.
Reddit board?
deleted by creator
If it’s purchased and yours, then you can do whatever you want to it. Up to and including modding and selling
If the quote is accurate, he went a step further and put pirated games on the devices. Even if pirating the game is legal in some way (he owns it legitimately so putting a copy is fine or something), sending such devices out to customers then means he’s also distributing pirated games.
That said, somebody in the comments claimed he didn’t distribute games, but rather software that made it easy to pirate games - I don’t know what the precedent is for that being considered illegal, but it does call the original claims into question.
While I morally agree with you, this is not how our world works yet.
Fuck Nintendo. Shit company.
For other reasons, yes. Would people blame Sony, or Microsoft, or even Sega for going after pirate material?
Going after the material is one thing.
Going after someone selling it is another. If the guy sold stuff and included pirated games in those sales, then he’s the problem.
According to the complaint, he did.
…I need to stop giving Nintendo money.
You haven’t done this already?
Well, it has been a while, I suppose.
Which eShop is still open? I need to update my pirated TOTK and Animal Crossing with the newest patches.
This is a very one sided article.
Its a very one sided situation.
