• Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    I might be a moron here, but I have no idea how to interpret this. Is each blue bar the proportion of streets that run in that direction? Do the ones that just have a single bar at N/E/S/W have perfectly aligned streets that only go in the cardinal directions?

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Here’s a portion of detroit:

      The city is almost entirely grid, some of it at an angle. You can see these two grids visualized in the post.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Seattle too has a section that’s perfectly n/s. It was built upon infill created by destroying larger hills, flattening the city and filling in the bays. The older city is canted off at a strange angle, you can see the streets change directions at denny way near downtown.

        Outside the downtown corridor everything is aligned NS iirc.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s my interpretation too.

      Newer cities tend to be more grid like. Older European cities tend not to follow a grid.

    • lemming
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also, how is the direction assigned? Especially for streets that are not straight? For example taking a beginning and end and measuring their angle wouldn’t be very representative. And how does it work with long and short streets? Are longer more heavily represented, or do they count the same? I’d like it if it took a tangent to the street every 100 m or so, but somehow I doubt that’s what they did.

        • lemming
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          So basically angles of ends of streets. Well, there are many options and we just don’t know which one it is.

    • ayyy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This might not be the best representation if you’re trying to depict “good” cities. Madrid is famous for having a very centrally planned and carefully considered grid, and yet the graph here looks like a mess.

  • zifk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fun thing is that in Montreal, ‘North’ is refereed to as the direction where streets go away from the river, which ends up being the WNW, further from north than “East”.

    • Asweet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Heh, yeah I was gonna make people guess which one was “north” for Montreal

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Tulsa, OK is a trip. Perfect square mile grids for most of the city. Looks like a chessboard flying in at night.

    Until you get out to the burbs, the streets are names crossed by numbers, everything regular… I used to navigate the whole town with one page from the phone book. Even when you get into numbers crossed by numbers, it still makes sense.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m surprised New Orleans has any NSEW streets considering we say “towards the river” or “towards the lake” and the “West Bank” is actually east of much of the “East Bank” because of how the Mississippi turns.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The part that really pisses me off in America at least, is that once you get outside the nice ordered grids of the city, you start getting into subdivisions. They start having all of these curved nonsense roads instead of again, nice straight grid lines. I understand that sometimes you have to divert around a natural feature, but that doesn’t excuse them deliberately making neighborhoods all twisty and grounded off so that it’s easy to get lost in there. Stick to the grid system. And if any European complains about it, remind them that [insert rival European country] is better than their own country.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I knew Boston would be a mess, but Charlotte, you okay there??

    I can’t function in a city with more than 20% of the roads being outside of the majority.

    Fuck Boston (lack of) city planners, and apparently I need to avoid Charlotte like the plague of disease that must’ve been occurring when they “laid out” that city.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well I mean that’s what’s going to happen when you have a city that’s laid out by a civilization who’s most advanced transportation technology is wagon.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are these taken from city center? I feel like San Francisco has much more north to south road than East to West.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Berlin’s network shape is unfortunately reminiscent of a swastika…