• Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Civil rights - LGBTQ+ legal funding, protecting youth from conversion therapy, healthcare access, reversing Trump’s ban on trans military personnel, housing protections

      Sustainable technology - “best” is hard among so many, probably the 65$ billion dollars inveatment for clean energy infrastructure in the US

      Critical infrastructure - the largest investment in US infrastructure in US history, over a trillion dollars resulting in over 50000 new infrastructure projects.

      Climate change - again, the “best” is tricky here…I guess either the hundreds of billions in green tech, clean energy, mass transit, rejoining climate accords, increasing regulations on polluters… You can choose any one of those.

      Oh and taxing the wealthy. Biden succeeded in that too.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Healthcare - Biden limiting drug prices helps a ton of people. Also, trump pledged to get rid of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and replace it with nothing. So… not ruining everything is also good.

        See that’s the thing, Biden would be a better president than trump if he literally pledged to do nothing. Trump has pledged to make things worse, mostly for his own benefit.

        That’s your choice: a shit sandwich or… not eating a shit sandwich. Tough one, I know.

        • Varyk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          5 months ago

          You are weirdly angry that Biden helped a lot of vulnerable people through drug pricing regulation.

          That’s what I’m saying. You’re agreeing with me.

          Some of Biden’s other first-term achievements(listed directly above) have been incredibly helpful to hundreds of millions of people.

          Weird that not eating a shit sandwich is a difficult decision for you, but maybe it explains why you don’t understand the previous comment.

          Biden isn’t a better president compared to dumps, he literally invested more in infrastructure and clean technology and climate change than any other president.

          Biden has made and is still making huge strides in civil rights.

          He’s taxing the wealthy.

          He’s making a lot of progressive strides.

          You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re agreeing with me.

            You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

            So why do you think I’m arguing with you?

            • Varyk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t.

              You’re agreeing with me that biden is a good president, but incorrect that he’s only a good precedent relative to Trump.

              You’re very confused. Do you have any questions?

              • ripcord@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                …but you said they’re arguing with you, which is why they asked why you think they’re arguing with you.

                • Varyk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  What I said is:

                  “what do you think you’re arguing about?”

                  I didn’t mention myself.

                  It’s clear they meant to be arguing something, but if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

                  If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

                  So, what do they think they’re arguing against?

                  • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    It’s clear they meant to be arguing something

                    Right…

                    if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

                    Keep going…

                    If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

                    Almost there…

            • Varyk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              I like the trolls, they are funny.

              I also accept that this is often sound, logical advice.

            • Varyk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              I like the trolls, they are funny.

              I also accept that this is often sound, logical advice.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        taxing the wealthy

        ^ That’s the one that triggered the media attack on him.

        • Varyk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I agree that the timing is overly conspicuous

    • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s nothing wrong with wanting supporting evidence for claims, but when someone says something that’s very provable and common knowledge and you ask for proof - you become known as an idiot.

    • Rookwood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Lmao at being downvoted for asking for tangible examples. Platitudes don’t win elections, folks. See 2016.

      • swim@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you’re curious about the downvotes, I would consider that it appears you thought you were “asking,” when what your comment does is issue a command. With no other context to understand from where you are coming.