• buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We strongly believe that Baillie Gifford are part of the solution to the climate emergency. They are early investors in progressive climate positive companies, providing funds to help them grow”.

    Says the guy getting funded by Baillie Gifford.

    No investment firm is part of the solution. Capitalism isn’t part of the solution.

    • mcgravier@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually it is. The issue of sustainable energy production solves itself as we speak. Not because of some activist initiative or international treaty, but because capitalism has turned green energy into a cheap energy

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism doesn’t push innovation, in fact it hampers it. But once innovation pushes through despite all the odds, capitalism is right there to exploit it and enshittify it as much as possible.

        Just because capitalism is the end-all be-all of our economic system right now does not mean it is responsible for all the good in the world. Good can exist in spite of a system, not just because of it.

        • mcgravier@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          1 year ago

          Capitalism doesn’t push innovation

          And yet you’re writing this from a stupidly complex computer made by capitalistic economic system. Oh the irony.

          • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Weird, I thought electrical engineers designed those computers but it turns out it was capitalism, because as we all know engineers only exist within a capitalist framework.

          • BirdOfSteel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just because it was made in a capitalist country doesn’t mean it was “made by capitalism”. Is someone paying you to be this ignorant?

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “You despise the system yet you continue to exist within it, curious…”

            If you read past the first part of the first sentence of the first paragraph of my comment you may have had a chance to read this thing I said as well:

            Good can exist in spite of a system, not just because of it.

      • bircelak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism incentivizes whichever enterprises currently controlling the market to suppress new innovation at all costs. Be better.

        • ilickfrogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? Oil companies have been doing literally everything in their power to suppress green energy so that they can milk their dirty cash cow. Capitalism is 99% of the problem.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually it isn’t. Capitalism isn’t interested in cheap energy. Capitalism is interest in cheap profits and so far there’s no other energy source as profitable as oil.

        Capitalism has actually fought against green energy, even after knowing the possible effects of continued reliance on fossil fuels. This site has a good summary of what Exxon and other oil companies knew and what exxon decided to do. The short gist is that back in 1970 got the first pretty definitive conclusion that CO2 emissions are a concern and they spend another 10-15 years researching the outcomes, finding out that it’s an ecological catastrophe and it ends with a memo from an Exxon spokesperson more or less saying that Exxon’s strategy will be to emphasize the uncertainty of the same scientific conclusion they spent almost 2 decades researching. Here’s literally the one of Exxons top lobbyist confirming that they did aggressively fight the science and the early efforts to prove climate change.

        The only reason we’re now seeing a shift towards green energy isn’t because of capitalism, but because government regulations finally understanding that oil companies (capitalism) has effectively played them like a fiddle for whatever short-term profits. It’s government regulations and subsidies that are now forcing capitalism towards green energy. Capitalism has little to nothing to do with turning green energy cheaper, instead it has tried to keep us from shifting to green energy for as long as it could simply because it was more profitable to stick with fossil fuel.

        • mcgravier@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, these are hard numbers. Renewables are cheaper than fossil and because of that, renewable energy production grows exponentially. Days of fossil fuels are counted, along with majority of oil and gas extraction industry