• prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    These products are experimental and usually sold at or near cost not to make money but to prove to the market there is a need and a demand.

    Well, no… I think it’s more akin to the concept of “loss-leaders”. Get people in the door and while they’re there, they’ll buy a game or two. Which is where their real profits come from.

    In the end, it’s still just a business strategy intended to result in profits for Valve.

    However, that being said, the fact that they don’t have a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders to maximize profits and keep that stock price up at (literally) all costs, allows them to operate the way they do.

    But don’t get it twisted, they are a for-profit corporation, and their ultimate goal is making money. They’re just not as shitty about it.

    The bar is REALLY fucking low these days.

    • Corigan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh for sure they are there for a profit. But as the best example in the industry let’s not unnecessarily attack them. Imagine how much more money they make if they did go public and how awful it would be for all of us.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Totally. I wasn’t trying to rag on Valve… More just a comment about capitalism in general and how shitty it is.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They kind of have to be about making money. No company survives by putting the needs of the customer above all else, unfortunately.