• SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Who writes and administers the test? And who ensures everyone has equal access to education so a non-voting underclass isn’t created?

    The United States used to have a “voting literacy test” which effectively existed to keep non-whites from voting. It was practically impossible to pass, so it was at the clerk’s discretion who could or could not vote.

    • merc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just because it was misused before doesn’t mean it’s an unworkable idea. Would it really make things worse than the mess we have now?

      Say, for example, you needed the support of a supermajority (67% or 75%) of the population to approve a test.

      There are lots of potential flaws with the system, and lots of “attack vectors”. But, you don’t need to come up with a test that’s perfect, just one that improves the current situation, which is pretty dire.

        • merc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, just like all the current flaws are being exploited. The question is whether this would make the overall system better or worse. If it means that people weaned solely on a very biased media source / conspiracy theories have less of a chance of their vote deciding things, it might make it better.

          It’s an attempt to address an existing problem that has obvious consequences right now.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m for it, assuming everyone has equal access to a robust, non-biased education and sufficient resources to have the time and energy to utilize it; the test isn’t designed to exclude by race, class, gender, etc.; and it is designed to simply ascertain whether or not a person is capable of self-directed, rational decision making versus voting for the prettiest or most charismatic candidate or the candidate who will “hurt the right people”.

        Many politicians would not want any of that.

        • Eylrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just cut to the chase and provide the education. If everyone has access to robust and adequate education then you don’t need the test.