The Linux ecosystem is vast and diverse, offering a multitude of distributions to suit every need and preference. With hundreds of distros to choose from, it’s a pity that most are rarely mentioned while the popular ones are constantly being regurgitated.

This thread aims to celebrate this diversity and shine a light on smaller projects with passionate developers. I invite you to pitch your favorite underappreciated distro and share your experiences with those lesser-known Linux distributions that deserve more attention.

While there are no strict rules or banlists, I encourage you to focus on truly niche or exotic distributions rather than the more commonly discussed ones. Consider touching upon what makes your chosen distro unique:

  • What features or philosophies set it apart?
  • Why do you favor it over other distros, including the popular ones? (Beyond “It just works.”)
  • In what situations would you recommend it to others?

Whether it’s a specialized distro for a particular use case or a general-purpose OS with a unique twist, let’s explore the road less traveled in the Linux landscape. Your insights could introduce fellow enthusiasts to their next favorite distribution!

  • puppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Haha nice try. If everyone starts liking it then it won’t be niche anymore. So I won’t share it! /s

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think nixos is still niche, but seems to be gaining momentum. It has some unique features:

    • Every package has its own dependencies, so you can install a 7 year old firefox alongside the latest, and have no interference.
    • Packages with dependencies in common still share them (for space savings).
    • Abandons the HFS, but can still fake it for apps that need it.
    • Can make dev environments that are exactly reproducible across machines, and only exist within a specific shell session. So you can have a project that relies on an out of date version of a compiler, and another that uses the latest, and run both at the same time.
    • Make your own packages that other people can install using a git repo address.
    • The package language can also describe a machine’s configuration; systemd services, default packages, user accounts, etc.
    • You can build and remotely deploy a machine config in one line.
    • You can cross compile a machine config for another cpu architecture, like ARM.
    • OS upgrades are atomic, and reversible. If it doesn’t work out, you can go back to the previous config.
    • No reason to ever reinstall. Recently upgraded a machine that had sat in a closet for 5 years to the newest release. Flawless upgrade.
    • Nixos boasts more packages than any other distro, over 100,000.

    There are certainly downsides - poor docs, confusing core language. Instructions for installing something on say debian will not work on nixos. I do think this style of package management is the future, if perhaps not this specific implementation. It can be a pain but its also super solid.

    • thejevans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I use NixOS on my workstations, and I’m slowly migrating many of my server VMs over to it.

      NixOS w/flakes + home-manager + impermanence on zfs + disko w/ nixos-anywhere is amazing and gives an insane amount of declarative control over your system.

      That said, the current state of the leadership gives me pause to recommend it to anyone, and I do have a few devil’s advocate responses to some of what you said:

      Every package has its own dependencies, so you can install a 7 year old firefox alongside the latest, and have no interference.

      Unless the dependency is Qt, then it better all be the same version.

      Abandons the HFS, but can still fake it for apps that need it.

      Using ldd and nix-alien to patch in dynamic libraries still sucks, and often doesn’t work without a lot of extra effort. If what I want isn’t in nixpkgs, and I can’t get nix-alien to work on the first try, I just end up not using whatever I was trying to run.

      • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I hear you, its great for most cases, but when a package isn’t available or downloads binaries that depend on hfs it sucks. I’ve been going through hell with android dev lately and am currently doing my compiles on debian, lol.

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago

    Alpine. The Linux, not GNU/Linux joke aside, Alpine’s kinda great. Light, fast, stable, great package manager. I’ve daily driven it on both a server and as my main distro and it’s pretty nice for both… Unless you’re on Nvidia.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      My first intro to it was with postmarketOS, and I have to say it felt super light and stable

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Huh, I’d never actually considered that Alpine Linux existed as something other than a base for docker containers.

    • wheeldawg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Want there a post I saw just the other day about Nvidia starting to make open source releases with one of the upcoming driver updates? I just saw it yesterday and didn’t even think I checked it out yet but it’s somewhere here on my “look at better later” lists here.

      It would be fine then if that was true.

        • wheeldawg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well there goes that good news. I hadn’t finished looking into it, it’s still in a tab I stashed here somewhere.

    • ___@l.djw.li
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That sounds like true freedom, and also like something I wish deeply that I had time and energy to make my daily driver - I’m a purist, but I’m also a pragmatist and i can feel the burnout already.

      Respect for using it as a daily driver - even for a personal only machine, that’s a pretty high bar, especially long term.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      More niche? Opensuse Kalpa.

      I started running it and their are some pains like figuring out which layer to install tablet driver software, undervolting software, and kde connect. Seam flatpak still sucks dick and the tray icon for it doesn’t work at all and it needs a ton of modifications to get things to where the native steam runtime just works, but still a fun experiment.

  • claymore@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Void is my favourite distro, although I haven’t used it for a while. Extremely fast package manager, rolling release but not bleeding edge, super simple, very fun to tinker with (more than Arch imo). I stopped using it because I wanted something more popular for easier troubleshooting. But if I ever get a secondary PC/laptop I’ll probably start using it again.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      take a look at Alpine Linux – Alpine, Void, and Gentoo all grew out of a similar “Linux plus BSD” attitude – Alpine’s package manager is as fast or faster than Void’s – Alpine is pretty under-represented (but not absent) on the desktop side of things while being rather over-represented in the container, VM, server side of things (meaning the small community tends to be rather admin heavy)

        • Drito
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m annoyed by these Gnome centered distros. If I had to choose a single DE for a distro, I 'd choose a flexible one that can run on potatoes, such as Xfce. I suppose Xfce as default is a part of the MX linux popularity.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I agree with this. In the case of Chimera Linux, it is a goal of the distro to have “no legacy” and so it is Wayland and Pipewire only from the start. That limited their choices back when they were making the decision.

            Xfce is still X only although they are making progress.

      • claymore@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh I know about alpine, sadly it didn’t “click” the same way void did and felt more like a distro to use in embedded systems or similar space constrained situations. Gentoo on the other hand I like, but the initial setup + waiting for stuff to compile put me off of it. Maybe I’ll try it again sometime with all precompiled packages.

      • ___@l.djw.li
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Underrepresented at best, at worst it’s arguably too easy to forget that Alpine is more than just container images.

        Not sure how to solve that problem, it’s my go to for rolling an image but wouldn’t normally make the shortlist for standalone machines. In a prod env, that’s basically Deb, RHEL derivatives, etc. In a personal env for me, Arch derivs tend to win out on non-critical services if only because I invariably learn something useful that I wouldn’t want to learn in prod.

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not a distro but Qubes. Incredible security and privacy out of the box. Not for everyone but absolutely one of the most interesting developments in the OS world in the past decade or two.

      • bsergay@discuss.onlineOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not the person you asked, but they might have referred to the fact that (technically) Qubes OS is not a Linux distro because it’s based on Xen instead. Though, even then, we might refer to it as a Xen distro (if anything).

        • jrgn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, I noticed. I miss not having a declarative system, but agree on Nix. I don’t have the time to learn all that. I think it seemed neat to use yaml, since it is pretty straight forward

      • governorkeagan@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I really wanted to try BlendOS but the installer didn’t work at all for me and a couple others (this was when v4 was released). Haven’t tried again recently though.

  • hitwright@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    Guix - It’s basically an abstraction over software compilation and distribution. It uses guile lisp language as glue to bind it all together. (Full programming language to configure with)

    The beauty arises if you want to get a minimal os running with a single application and package it either as a full iso or a docker container you can. Or if you need to get an OS to run as your router.

    It’s also highly encourages free software to the point, that proprietary software actually feels like huge downgrade to include. (Compilation from source is always available)

    I’ve been using this only for 11 months. I’ve barely scratched the surface on what is possible. So I’m pretty sure I’m not making it justice on what a gem it is. For example: Only recently I started to use programs in an immutable way.

      • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The guix manual is pretty well explained. Now i’m learning Guile (Scheme’s dialog) and learning to configure both guix and guix system.

        The fact of being able to revert system and home environment software installation and configuration without breaking anything, is too good to be true.

        It’s also very cool to define packages either as compiled software or source packages to compile.

      • hitwright@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Since there are not many developers there are some build systems that are more prioritized than others. If you come from emacs side of things, it’s great. Rust is around 4 versions older. And the single developer recently burned out. The package manager is a lot like nixos, so every package requires work to introduce to the system.

          • Laser@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            The NixOS ecosystem while maybe sometimes both chaotic and heavily centralized just seems miles ahead of what Guix System has to offer unfortunately; nix is a weird language (I’m not qualified to rate it but people have called it a bad DSL), but it does the job, and there were some factors that ruled out Guix System for me. Secure Boot support was one of them, which NixOS doesn’t support “natively”, but there is Lanzaboote. For better or for worse this kind of forced me to look into flakes very early.

          • hitwright@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Thanks for the info, although versioning afaik not the thing that keeps it behind. There are tools to import the necessary packages with ‘guix import crate’. It automatically selects the necessary packages.

            Difficulties arise when Cargo.toml for example uses git as source. Then you have to pull and write specifications for not a standard package. The build system is isolated and cannot download anything off the internet.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              So what nix does is it hashes the inputs, so git still works even immutably if the hash matches

              • hitwright@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Does nix require the exact commit be written out for the package, or does it generate a hash during the build taking the newest git commit?

    • rescue_toaster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      My first linux install was crunchbang. I don’t remember why I picked it. Perhaps i liked the minimalistic look. Ended up not really liking openbox and I vaguely remember running into some problem with debian’s old packages, though I honestly can’t remember what. So I switched to ubuntu, which was great for me as a linux noob.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I started using Crunchbang because it was so lightweight and ran great on Virtual Box on Windows 7. I stopped using it, when they stopped developing it. I wasn’t aware of ++. I will be installing it this evening.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I know this might be asking for trouble, but how does BunsenLabs compare to CB++? I know they both came out of Crunchbang but I went with BL when that died.

      These days I’m on EndeavourOS, but I still use Openbox instead of DEs and customize it to look as much like Crunchbang as possible 😄

      Edit: also, I feel naked without Conky on my desktop.

  • bsergay@discuss.onlineOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    May as well contribute my own 😜.

    I’m an absolute sucker for exquisitely hardened distros. Hence, distros like Qubes OS and Kicksecure have rightfully caught my interest. However, the former’s hardware requirements are too harsh on the devices I currently own. While the latter relies on backports for security updates; which I’m not a fan of. Thankfully, there is also secureblue.

    Contrary to the others, secureblue is built on top of an ‘immutable’ and/or atomic base distro; namely Fedora Atomic. By which:

    • It’s protected against certain attacks.
    • Enables it to benefit from more recent advancements and developments that benefit security without foregoing robustness.

    If security is your top priority, Qubes OS is the gold standard. However, secureblue is a decent (albeit inferior) alternative if you prefer current and/or ‘immutable’/atomic distros.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The atomicity probably counts as an interesting feature, but it does seem to be getting more popular.

    • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I installed it on my Desktop, replacing LMDE. Unfortunately I have trouble running the one game that I play even though it works on Linux with Steam. It worked in Linux Mint, but for some reason it won’t start in Bazzite. Surely it’s because I have an Nvidia graphics card, but that wasn’t a problem with Linux Mint.

      Another problem that I ran into was Firefox (flatpak) crashing all the time. Luckily you just have to disable wayland using Flatseal, but I still get graphics glitches with it.

      I’m thinking of restoring my Linux Mint backup.

      I don’t know why I’m responding to your comment, I just wanted to share my experience, I guess.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not niche, but surely exotic: NixOS, a distribution that is configured via a purely functional language. There is no such thing as installing or uninstalling packages, you add or remove things from your configuration and then simply apply that configuration.

    • canadaduane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I really wanted to like NixOS (and I do, theoretically), but I couldn’t dedicate more than 5 full days over Christmas to learn how to get to a working development system.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        May I ask what the issue actually was? Was it about “working system” or about “working development system”?

        I don’t recall needing more than two days for getting a system up and running for the first time, and in fact it worked so well that I switched all my machines to it by now; granted, I have changed a lot about the configuration ever since and there seem to be a lot of paths to take in the beginning and it’s not always clear which one to take. But getting a working system, even one suited for development (personally, I’d recommend a nix development shell for that), shouldn’t really take that long.

        • canadaduane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Working development system. I got quite far, but after so much work, became very frustrated when a VSCode plugin wouldn’t work properly because it needed (and assumed) read/write access. I didn’t want to have to manage and think about every little plugin I experimented with at the OS level.

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          For me, the main blocker was just getting my head around the concept of it, as it seems like such a wild idea for a distro. I still don’t think I’m 100% there, but I have enough down now to cobble a working system together at least.

        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Using it on all my machines (desktop and notebooks), can’t really complain – but then again, couldn’t really complain about Arch either

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think it could be good for something like an office, where it might be beneficial to have everyone on an identical setup that’s immutable so they can’t mess with it, and can (presumably) be duplicated by just copying a config file.

          I assume the con would be that if something breaks in an update, it probably breaks for everyone. But by the same token, the solution should fix it for everyone too.

      • governorkeagan@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I couldn’t even get the installer to work. Tried a couple times but it just wouldn’t install so I gave up on it - still want to try it though

    • Justine Smithies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same as a Chimera Linux user I’d definitely recommend trying it. I was a Void user beforee and was Swithering whether to go full BSD when I stumbled across Chimera which gives me the best of both worlds.

      • Uli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I finally got fed up with my Windows machine and upon seeing symptoms of motherboard failure, I’ve ordered all the parts for a new rig and intend on installing Linux as my primary OS.

        Haven’t decided on a distro yet. I’m a DevOps engineer with a few passion projects, so I plan on setting up a couple of kubernetes clusters where I can play. I do all the usual things (word processing, gaming, web browsing, multimedia, etc), plus some AI stuff (stable diffusion, local LLMs, OpenCV). Ideally don’t want to have to fuss with drivers too much, but I don’t mind getting my hands dirty every now and then.

        Is Chimera the kind of distro I should be looking at, or should I pick something else for my first go at full-time Linux?

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Chimera Linux is awesome but it is still in Alpha. I would not recommend it as a first distro at this point unless you have a very tinker personality. It is high quality but lacks polish. For example, it does not have a real installer yet ( more of a set of instructions ).

        • dotslashme@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          My reason for not using Chimera as a daily driver is because I am a developer and there are still packages I need, that require libc still. My only advice would be to look through their packages and make sure you can find the things you need in there. If not, you need to research if the package you want is available through some other source and can run with musl instead of libc.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Sound reasoning. That said…

            Have you considered using Distrobox?

            You can use Distrobox to crate a dev environment on Chimera based on a glibc distro ( like Arch for example with its 80,000 up-to-date packages ).

            This has the added bonus of keeping your dev environment somewhat apart from your main install. If you ever want a clean slate ( too many junk packages accumulated or you mess something up ), you can refresh your dev environment without impacting your main desktop. You can also have multiple dev environments for different projects.

            Small nit-pick: MUSL is libc too. I think you meant to say Glibc ( the GNU libc implementation ).

            • dotslashme@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              That is a case I had not considered, thank you for the suggestion, and thank you for the correction concerning glibc.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dietpi for me. It is meant for sbc’s, but it can (also) be installed on x86 pcs. And its focus is on minimalism – as much as possible.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I love dietpi. The entire software install is a huge 1000 line bash script. If that sounds horrific, it’s genuinely well structured and readable

      • ___@l.djw.li
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        It does sound horrific, but mostly because it would be poorly executed by many devs.

        Well, and the seeming trend towards install commands that look like curl $file.sh | sh

        But if they’re not actively encouraging that, I see no issue with a well maintained install tool, created from well maintained toolsets that work on essentially any platform.

        • gerdesj@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Never heard of sh, I use bash and I call it as /usr/bin/bash (for security).