• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    512 months ago

    Poor choice of colours: distinguishing between the orange of 2025 and the red of 2040 is very hard, especially considering most people will read this on a small phone screen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      I don’t want to talk down your issue, but on my 5" screen they’re easily differentiable. Which colours would be better? Something like a colour gradient in say green with a different projection?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        I guess depending on size and colour rendition of displays it can be easier / harder, but overall I’d still say it’s a poor choice.

        A choice of different colours is OK, but specifically those 2 are pretty hard to distinguish. Simply changing one of them to black, which looks like no other colour used in the map, would be much better.

        I don’t think a gradient works for colouring a map like this: we can distinguish gradient colours when they are next to each other, but if 2 countries far away have adjacent values the colours would probably be too similar to tell the difference.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      Mexico…next year? That’s 5 months away and I haven’t seen anything about major shifts to their infrastructure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Holy shit. I wonder if this is just on paper, though, given the way countries in the region work and the questionable practicality of that before full electrification.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 months ago

    Glad to see the west coast and Canada banning ICE, but 2035 is late. We should be massively pushing ebikes in cities along with public transit. Get fewer car trips ASAP, even if we can’t get off ICE overnight.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      Canada’s plan is for the exact same amount of people to be driving, but just with lithium instead of gasoline. No change to our urban planning, transit infrastructure, or car dependency. We’re screwed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        I wouldn’t say that’s entirely true. Vancouver, Vancouver island, and Montreal have some interesting bike infrastructure. Calgary has at least some infrastructure, too. Shifter is a canadian youtube channel that covers many of the canadian cities and discusses them in relation to other bike-centric cities around North America and Europe.

        But yes, Canadian and American cities could use much more investment and a Parisian-style revision in road and plaza use, dedicating more places to bikes and foot traffic. Subsidizing ebikes will also help get people off cars.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 months ago

    Even if bans like this pass it will take several decades after those bans for ICE vehicles to actually disappear. The vast majority of cars sold here are used and buying one that’s 2 decades old is not uncommon. Until battery replacements become affordable the people who are buying used aren’t going to use EVs because those replacements cost more than a used ICE car.

  • Coskii
    link
    fedilink
    32 months ago

    Kinda surprised China doesn’t have a shade in this… They have been mass producing cheap little evs like no one else.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If we can just get the remaining countries to jump on board by the year 2005, we might avoid the worst effects of climate change.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I see Uruguay there… My country has no plans to phase out gasoline cars sales by 2025. We barely have the infrastructure for the current ones really. What we have is a plan to start giving benefits and tax cuts that starts on 2025 is called “subite” translates roughly to “get on”.
    Edit it’s 2040 but still that plan is not voted at all.

  • MewtwoLikesMemes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 months ago

    It both saddens me and doesn’t surprise me one bit that the US is so far behind that we don’t even have a color.

    We are fucking idiots, the lot of us. Ugh…

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      I mean, some of the wealthiest and most populated regions are coloured 2035, so that’s that

      • MewtwoLikesMemes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Could you clarify how that is relevant to my comment? (Note: I’m not saying it isn’t; I’m saying I don’t see the connection.)

        • Fonzie!
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          You said the US is so far behind it doesn’t even have a colour.

          I noted that the wealthiest and most populated regions do have a colour, indicating 2035. Perhaps I should clarify I meant those regions of the US, like California.

          So at least not all of the US is so far behind, maybe that could be any consolidation?

          • MewtwoLikesMemes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Ah, fair enough. Thank you for explaining.

            And this is true. Sadly, though, most of the US seems almost akin to a different country compared to the west coast, culturally speaking.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They’ll be fine. There’s no roads either.

      (Well, there’s a few in the Western half, but there’s enough stops you could still do it in an EV once the infrastructure is there)

      Edit: Here’s an example. I think charging stations are still lacking for long-distance travel, but there’s no reason that couldn’t change.