• agamemnonymous
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 个月前

    Your criticisms are non sequiturs.

    Your comment about anarchists and electorialism was a response to a comment saying anarchists prefer the center right party over the far right party. No one said anything about anarchists canvassing and fundraising for the center right party.

    Your criticisms of canvassing and fundraising, while not entirely untrue, are absolutely irrelevant to to topic at hand. When you’re having a discussion, you keep your comments relevant to the topic of discussion. That’s like… the basics of conversation.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Just cause you don’t want to engage with a conversation doesn’t mean thah the other person makes non sequiturs.

      • agamemnonymous
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 个月前

        Correct, that doesn’t make them non sequiturs. What makes them non sequiturs is being unrelated to the topic. I choose not to engage because they’re irrelevant, not the other way around. I choose this because I don’t entertain Gish Gallop distractions, they muddy the water of productive conversations.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 个月前

          I was tryiig to get across that anarchists don’t “prefer” any party, if they have the alternative of not focusing on electoralism. That’s not a non-sequitur, that’s correcting a lacking representation of aiarchists.

          Anarchists usually also prefer liberal democracy over a feudal system. But stopping at that statement would also misrepresent anarchists.

          • agamemnonymous
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 个月前

            Preference is relative. In a binary choice, the less bad option is preferred. This was the clear message of the comment you replied to.

            Your reply neither refuted this, nor effectively communicated the message you’re currently on. All it does is imply that anarchists benefit in some way from ignoring elections.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 个月前

              As I said: just because you don’t want to engage, doesn’t mean that it’s a non-sequitur.

              • agamemnonymous
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 个月前

                As I said, it’s not a non sequitur because I’m not engaging, I’m not engaging because is a non sequitur. It’s a very simple concept.