Bonus question: what email inbox client do you use?

  • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    ProtonMail. Works great for the most part.

    Except their desktop “app”, which is total shit. It’s just a webview in an electron framework. If I wanted to keep a webview, I’d just keep a tab open in my browser. Or a separate browser window if I wanted to keep it separate.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve hosted my Mail with them for over a year, still have them as my backup. I wouldn’t really recommend them, as they don’t adhere to the standard protocols which infuriates me. As a result, you can only use a proper email client on PC with the back they call bridge, you cannot use a proper client on phones, forget syncing of calendar and contacts.

      There is more, especially for the non-mail products.

      • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        as they don’t adhere to the standard protocols

        To what standards protocols do you refer? (I’m honestly asking; I’m not very knowledgeable about email architectures.)

        As a result, you can only use a proper email client on PC with the back they call bridge

        I thought that is kind of required simply due to the nature of their email service being end-to-end encrypted and with the decryption key being stored locally only.

        Am I misunderstanding something?

        • timbuck2themoon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re not. The whole point is encryption so the bridge is a must.

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I meant IMAP, SMTP, POP3. It’s true that they do some encryption shenanigans, but firstly I don’t really see the benefit over just using encrypted SMTP and encrypted IMAP, and secondly we already have PGP for that, IMO it would be better if they made that more accessible.

          Some people might not be bothered by this, but it bothers me a lot. Which is why I left. The reduction of usability is not tolerable.

          Besides that, they also don’t support CalDAV and CardDAV (syncing of contacts and calendar), which is something that groupware absolutely needs to be viable for me.

          You might disagree or not care, if so, good for you, there is definitely much worse than proton.

          • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            shenanigans

            To call it “shenanigans” IMO doesn’t give it due credit.

            As for the PGP thing, I’ve been with ProtonMail since they were in beta way back in 2013-ish and one of their founding goals was to provide encryption that was accessible to even casual users.

            And like it or not, PGP is a thing that is quite confusing to most people, assuming they even know what it is.

            Besides that, they also don’t support CalDAV and CardDAV (syncing of contacts and calendar), which is something that groupware absolutely needs to be viable for me.

            Couldn’t agree more. They really need to extend Bridge to support calendar sync.