• EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You’re being unusually argumentative, and this argument with you is extraordinarily tiresome.

    You haven’t presented any evidence that any harm is being done, and you’re over complicating this argument Beyond any point that is necessary. That’s why I’m being dismissive. You continue assert that there is something wrong when you have presented no evidence that supports that claim. In fact, you constantly evade that claim.

    It’s not up to me to prove your claim, it’s up to you, and you haven’t. In fact, the evidence you did present supports my position. The fact that you can’t seem to understand that tells me that you’re more interested in arguing than you are in accepting facts. Also, that at this point, you’re probably just trolling me. Also, that I should probably just block you and move on with my day.

    I’m gonna stick by Hitchens or razor on this one.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Pfft. That’s the most ridiculous answer you could’ve given and you avoided every single one of my questions. I’m not sure if you’re looking for particular signs of cytotoxicity or you want he to prove that it causes hypoxia or what. But there are clear signs of intoxication that you’re actively ignoring just to confirm your beliefs.

      I repeat my last line. What incredible irony to ask for evidence, dismiss it, and still do it despite it and in the absence of it. You’re actively not interested in the facts or give proper weight to them. Block away. I’m not sure why I’m also wasting my time and energy with someone who doesn’t want to listen in earnest and would rather poison their pets and keep being confrontative beyond reason. Oh well, I thought we were adults.

    • Jax
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ratio’d.

      Not to mention, your cat has the intelligence of maybe a 3 year old. You’re sitting here arguing about whether or not it’s toxic to give weed to a cat when it has the ability to consent as much as a 3 year old does.

      Enjoy whatever you enjoy, IDC - you’re a bad person for exposing your cat to the smoke, moreso that you’re doing it with the intent of getting it high whilst ignoring the potential downsides.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Could be worse— I could care about imaginary internet points or be confused about the meaning of the word “toxic”. But I suppose that such is the life of one who fills their day judging internet strangers.

        ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • Jax
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          You are either:

          1. giving your cat a toxic substance

          2. giving something with the intellectual capacity of a 3 year old weed

          Both are toxic. You’re a bad person.