• collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    And so far, renewables have just let us use even more energy each year. I bet 2024 sets a new record for emissions. We won’t cut emissions until we are facing a shortage of fossil fuels or our population declines from climate change. It’s a race to see which will happen first.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Through 2023, renewable growth wasn’t yet fast enough to force a cut in emissions. That potentially changed this year

            • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Last year Germany had a 10% reduction in emissions with a 0.3% decline in GDP. German GDP dropped by 3% due to the 2008 financial crisis. So oversimplified maths says a fairly noraml recession is enough to solve it. The investment into green technologies necessary to maintain a or enable a good material quality of life for everybody would boost the global economy a lot. Obviously there would be regions doing much worse, but others would do a lot better.

              Most of what made the panedmic so bad, was the lack of social interactions. That is not a problem in terms of emissions. What is, is commuting to work.

              • spidermanchild
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                This is exactly the calculation China made as they’ve positioned themselves to be the region doing a lot better. If everyone would realize this and fight for their slice of the pie, we’d be doing a lot better.

  • Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah BUT what about the shareholders, won’t somebody please think of the profit margins. /s