• Grandwolf319
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    How could they even allow this? Isn’t ublock an independent plugin?

    Also, how about other chromium browsers?

    EDIT: click bait headline, chrome is just deprecating a dependency it uses and ublock isn’t using the new version yet.

    Edit 2: I didn’t realize v3 was nurfed intentionally,

    Fuck google

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This was all about the news probably 2 years ago. Chrome uses a new api manifest that does not allow for changes in websites like blocking specific type of content. Once manifest v3 is fully implemented and enforced there will be no way for ublock origin to work correctly anymore.

      • Grandwolf319
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Didn’t realized v3 was nurfed on purpose, should never give google the benefit of the doubt.

    • ghterve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The word “just” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in your edit. The replacement for that dependency doesn’t allow an extension to work as an ad blocker as effectively as the thing they are deprecating. This is deliberate.