• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    4 months ago

    You know who’s disproportionately impacted by spam filters? Spammers.

    You know what email users don’t like to receive? Spam.

  • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 months ago

    The suit alleged that Google’s email platform labeled GOP fundraising emails as spam at a higher rate than those from the other side of the aisle.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      4 months ago

      Spam filtering is largely based on user reports. If their emails are getting marked by users at a higher rate than the other side of the aisle, that’s because people are thinking the emails are spam, and thus should be filtered as such.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        I donated once to Obama, and once in Wisconsin to watch the cast of The Princess Bride do a table read of the movie. I get a lot of emails ever since soliciting more donations. Honestly they are basically spam, but I never report them as such. I could probably opt out, but I just ignore them and gain even more “unread points” in my mailbox game.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          The polite thing is unsubscribe. And when the service doesn’t follow through, smash that report button.

          I’m wondering if GOP emails with their constant scare tactic really bothered people, hence more likely to hit report.

          The other assumption is that its also based on open rates & sends, which Google has. I’m going to assume (sample size of one, me) that most people don’t actively sign up to get political emails and get their updates elsewhere. While GOP folks follow everything to show support. Which also means low open rates, or inflated fake emails. All of that can signal to Google the newsletter is worthless, or spam.

        • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Similar situation, occasional Dem donor getting donation requests from every Democrat running in every state. It’s annoying and I tend to unsubscribe but have occasionally reported as spam. I prefer to donate to more high stakes races.

        • brbposting
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s funny that you say that, I was getting consistent emails from Biden but never unsubscribed. The subject lines are kind of like headlines. “Biden campaign emails [presumptive] supporters [clever]/[desperate]/[humorous) email”. Some email marketing insights direct from a source.

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Thank god, now that they know they won’t have to reverse the program soon, hopefully they’ll fix the Republicans getting through text message screening too

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago
    Engadget Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Name: Engadget Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/engadget/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.