• El Barto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4711 months ago

    Blizzard was quick to clamp down on the unethical practice

    Unethical practice… it’s a video game ffs, you coded a buggy game and are now trying to guilt people for using said bug by claiming their actions are unethical… let’s look at how ethical your company is hey blizzard?

    Glass houses and whatnot.

    I’m glad I’ve never given blizzard a cent of my money.

    • @meat_popsicle
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      let’s look at how ethical your company is hey blizzard?

      “Uhh…we’re Microsoft now, nobody named Blizzard has ever been at this address.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2711 months ago

    We released a game with a huge bug, but it’s your fault that you take advantage of it. Imagine paying $70 at least only to be baned because of this bs

    • @winterayars
      link
      English
      1211 months ago

      This is the absolute worst thing to come out of the “free to play”/“pay to win” genre of games. “Our game is full of bugs? No, it’s the children that are wrong.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2311 months ago

    I despise companies that pull bullshit like this. Yes, it is obviously an exploit. Yes, it is breaking the game. However, Blizzard, YOU RELEASED THE BROKEN BULLSHIT. This isn’t some freeware title hoping to eek by on a donation. This is a multi billion dollar company that has had years of development to get this shit right. Fuck you, Blizzard. I’m glad I didn’t pay for your shit, and I will continue with that trend into the foreseeable future. Dump some of your capital into QA instead of CEO wallets. Companies shouldn’t be able to ban someone from playing something that they paid for, unless explicitly stated in the EULA, and a generic clause about “exploits” isn’t explicit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        711 months ago

        You’ve missed the point. I don’t want them to list every potential bug. I know that isn’t possible. What I want is to not have this knee-jerk ban reaction because someone found a bug and used it to their advantage. As far as I’m concerned, until something is said to the community about a particular bug, the game is working as intended, and the onus is on the company to sort it out. That’s like if you bought a ticket to Disney, went inside, went to restaurant, ordered your meal, and a disgruntled employee told you, “No charge,” and let you walk off without paying. You think Disney should ban someone because they accepted a free lunch after paying $60 to enter the park? No. They should fire the employee, which, in this analogy, means fixing the bug.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1311 months ago

    Ridiculous for single player games, this is what I see D4 as primarily. People should be able to do whatever they want and exploit whatever. Mark their save as modded, exclude them from rankings and PvP and call it a day. But companies don’t want that, because it would potentially hurt their nasty IAP schemes.

    I also don’t have much sympathy for the victims, because they bought a product from a well known awful company.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 months ago

    The exploit in question: You disconnect and transfer non-seasonal items to a seasonal character.

    Sounds like a ban worthy exploit to me

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      transfer non-seasonal items to a seasonal character.

      I haven’t been following Diablo 4, could somebody explain this bit? The article doesn’t explain why transferring items is so disruptive, or what seasonal and non-seasonal items are.

      • BarteringRam
        link
        English
        9
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So, Diablo has two “realms” in which characters can be in, the seasonal realm being one of these. As the name suggests, the seasonal realm is where seasonal characters play through seasons, which are periods of time in which players attempt to complete multiple levels of increasingly difficult challenges. Playing the seasons can earn a player rewards, both free and paid, through the battle pass, which unlocks these rewards based partly on seasonal progress. Seasonal characters are created new at the beginning of the season, and transfer to the other realm, eternal, at season end, where they persist.

        Being that there are paid rewards, I can understand and support Blizzard’s reaction. Allowing players to exploit a paid service, even in a way that seemingly doesn’t effect others, sets a poor precident. Beyond that, I’m not sure if there are ways in which it effects me, but I’ve not participated in much PVP, which I think would be the most obvious advantage, as otherwise we’re not competing.

      • all-knight-party
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        I don’t have 4, but if it’s like 3 then there are regular characters who can die and are persistent, then there are seasonal characters who can die but may only be created at the beginning of, and are deleted at the end of, a given season.

        Then there’s hardcore, who are persistent forever but can only die one time. All three have their own ecosystems in which characters created in a given mode can share gold, certain upgrades, and items with each other, but not outside of their own mode. You can have multiple hardcore characters share items and gold, but you can’t give those to regular or seasonal characters, and so on.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      Agreed, D4 was super disappointing and blizzard sucks but that’s a reasonable ban.

  • Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    711 months ago

    I’m not surprised to see this at all. Blizzard has always been pretty protective of their in-game economies, and this exploit flooded the seasonal realm with a ton of gold that shouldn’t have been there. Anybody who tried this should have 100% expected to get banned.

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Rollbacks with live service games generally don’t go over well with the players, especially the ones who did nothing wrong in the first place.

        The problem with doing a rollback is that, unless you want to spend a lot of time fixing the things the rollback breaks, you have to roll EVERYTHING on the server back. This means all players will have progress reset and items lost. More players are likely to quit the game than Blizzard will lose by banning a few cheaters.

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          you have to roll EVERYTHING on the server back.

          Why is this implied? Why can’t a single character or account be rolled without affect any other character?

  • @Aphroditusss
    link
    English
    511 months ago

    I’m glad I ditched this dumpster fire early on as soon as I got a satisfying amount of hours played. Definitely the last time blizzard will see my money, at least on the Diablo franchise.

    • khab
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      Jaysis. Just stop buying these exploitative and morally bankrupt games. No “at least on the X franchise”. No “I won’t pay any microtransactions”. No “I won’t preorder”.

      They will not change, nor get better as long as they’re selling.

      Just STOP buying this shite, everyone.

    • Tb0n3
      link
      English
      311 months ago

      You didn’t learn your lesson from Diablo 3 or Immortals?

      • @Aphroditusss
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Unfortunately I was very young when D3 came out and I never played Immortals. So I had to learn from D4 ¯_(ツ)_/¯

      • Maple
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1611 months ago

        Bruh literally looks at two RPGs and says they have nothing in common lmao

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          BRUH, one is an dungeon crawling loot focused aarpg. The other, a hybrid real-time strategy based rpg, almost the closest thing to a digital pen and paper tabletop.

          Having played d2, D3, d2 redux, d4, bg, bg2, and icewind dale, what are you talking about?? They couldn’t be any different

          • Maple
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1411 months ago

            You’re arguing semantics. BG3 respects your time and wallet, D4 doesn’t it’s that simple. But you do you.

              • Maple
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -511 months ago

                Imagine projecting so hard and having a terrible take on top of it. Like, it’s one thing to have an opinion and it’s another thing entirely to believe it’s the only correct opinion. The narcissism is strong in you lol I suggest you go touch grass.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  311 months ago

                  it’s one thing to have an opinion and it’s another thing entirely to believe it’s the only correct opinion

                  He said without a hint of irony

    • @Corkyskog
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      Anyone know if the PS5 version will have local multi-player?

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 months ago

        There is only so much time in this mortal existence.

      • Maple
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -211 months ago

        You’re free to do what you want, but I for one will not be supporting them based on their monetization strategies and anti-consumer practices.

        Blizzard just has to be like Larian, release a feature complete singleplayer game with the ability to play multiplayer, it’s that easy. No need for battlepasses, or $30 skins, no need for always online drm.

        These are terrible business practices born of greed and hubris that need to die.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Blizzard just has to be like Larian, release a feature complete singleplayer game with the ability to play multiplayer

          Do they though? Diablo is the most successful loot crawling aarpg of all time.

          No need for battlepasses, or $30 skins,

          If it’s all cosmetic and doesn’t influence gameplay, why care?

          • Maple
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -211 months ago

            Do they though? Diablo is the most successful loot crawling aarpg of all time.

            You’re free to be okay with being disrespected I guess, but that’s not me.

            If it’s all cosmetic and doesn’t influence gameplay, why care?

            We’ll I’m not sure about others. But I appreciate when I spend $60 on a title that I get the complete and full experience “cosmetics” and all. That’s just me I guess.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  For starters, I said strange. Frighteningly strange, not scary. Secondly, the kids goes off unhinged about how D4 sucks and everyone should play BG3. Being a HUGE fan of both franchises, not only was he being a reductive asshole, but as I pointed out they aren’t even worth comparing. The two are completely different genres.

                  Then he doubles down on how either they aren’t or they are but it doesn’t matter (sorry. “semantics” wasn’t specifc enough) and goes off on some unfounded tirade about Blizzards practices and how he feweels Blizzard needs to shape the most successful aarpg of all time like Larian.

                  Not to mention this post has nothing to do with Baldur’s Gate. It was about people cheating in the first season of D4…

                  I can continue if you like?

              • Maple
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -411 months ago

                I don’t know how. Anyone with some semblance of self-respect would agree with me. Just check the latest comment it’s literally someone saying in all caps “stop buying blizzard products” it isn’t madness, there’s a reason to it. Blizzard doesn’t care about you, they don’t respect your time or your wallet. But if you don’t understand it, then who am I to argue?