• Tb0n3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally the shit we knew about since the shuttle program at least. Yet they still tried the most powerful rocket ever made without it.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it was a really strange corner to cut. It probably caused the first launch to go so poorly.

      Who knows, they could’ve even gone orbital (I know they weren’t planning on going fully orbital but still)

      • qwamqwamqwam
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A massive spray of concrete chunks into the engine bells didn’t help, but Starship’s Raptor 2s are having reliability issues independent of the launch site failure. They went into the test with multiple engines nonfunctional right from the start and anticipating that more would shut down. I think the launch wouldn’t have achieved its stated trajectory even if the pad had held.