JPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing
www.youtube.com
JPEG XL faces fierce competition from AVIF. And Google. A bit of bothUpdate about JPEG XL support and why it's a mixed bag: https://x.com/nixcraft/status/183...
  • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    3·
    3 months ago

    Weird, I just saw that video popup in my YouTube feed and now here it is in my Lemmy feed.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    I was unaware of JPEG-XL until I saw that video. Now I need this to become a standard. I figured out how to enable support in Librewolf, it’s buggy but it mostly works. JPEG-XL is my new favorite image format.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    215·
    3 months ago

    Just saw that this is a community dedicated to this, but still i feel a need to tell you: jpeg-xl is kinda shit and does not need saving. Its vastly inferior to avif for all practical online use cases and all the issues with avif will be resolved sooner rather than later.

    All the minor and major internet data transmitters have an interest in making avif better and its already used all over the place anyways. It works with every common browser, image viewer and editor already so the complaints from the video are really odd.

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.worldEnglish
      14·
      3 months ago

      What aspect of jpegxl do you think is inferior to avif? (You said jpeg, but I assume you meant jpegxl)

    • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mlEnglish
      10·
      3 months ago

      Doesn’t the video basically prove the opposite? That aside from a study sponsored by avif and Google that is likely biased, in practical use cases jpxl actually comes out ahead in almost every metric and is also not proprietary?