- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
A reminder that the Linux Foundation does what its members want. The members may not care about the Linux desktop, but more server oriented things and running LLMs on those servers.
That’s the way to go! AI isn’t bad. Closed sourced AI is.
That “ethical” is problematic. What considered to be ethical is very subjective to the culture context.
Edit: better wording
Im down to permit what the Linux Foundation considers ethical in this context. They seem to have their head screwed on straight
Sweet. There has been a little too much “open” just enough to contribute but restrictions on the actual end user.
The Linux foundation isn’t exactly known for “ethics”
Why is that?
That’s a penis dot gif
I think you might need to see a doctor
clearly, it’s obviously pronounced jif
No mister/miss. Porn creation is one of the concerns about open models because they can’t even prohibit it in the license.
Did you reply to the wrong comment?
No. I think the comment I replied to was supposed to mean that the person had issues with seeing sexual stuff everywhere. I disagreed because in this case porn creation is a legitimate concern.
That’s not discussed in the article though, I think they were just seeing a (not really that) phallic logo
Oh ok I really didn’t see that.
